Panna Rajnikant Parmar v. Rajanikant Lallubhai Parmar Deceased
Case brief
What is this about?
For-direction order, Testamentary Petition TP/5713/2025, Bombay High Court Testamentary Department, OSD Shri. P. A. Jagdale, dated 19.11.2025; counsel Vimal Sanghvi i/b Yash Arora for petitioner. Directives: citation within two weeks; notice to Collector under Rule 396 BHC (O.S.) Rules 1980; citation to non-consenting legal heirs; Chapter XXVI requisitions (proper prayer, legal heirs information, explanation of delay, locker inventory); service of General Citation and on non-consenting heirs per Rules 399-400; petitioner to justify shares of non-consenting heirs; administration bond for gross amount under Rule 420 within one week if other heirs exist; cross-petition verification under Rule 407; S.O. to 20.01.2026. No precedent engaged; no quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief granted. Interim 'for direction' order issued: citation within two weeks, notice to the Collector under Rule 396, citation to non-consenting legal heirs, compliance with Chapter XXVI requisitions, service per Rules 399-400, administration bond per Rule 420 if other heirs exist, verification of any cross-petition under Rule 407; matter stood over to 20.01.2026.