Sohail Nathani Son of Zain Mohomed vs Zain Mohomed Muss (Deceased)

¶1

1 TP-5023 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR^th January’2025

¶3

Sr No. - 27-TP/5023/2024 (AMH20240129954C202400020)

¶4

Ms. Jyoti Badgujar i/b. Lakdawala & Co., Advocate for the petitioner.

¶5

Called for Compliance

¶6

Perused the Petition. Heard Advocate for petitioner. Advocate for petitioner submits that the present petition is for Succession Certificate in respect of certain Securities belonging to the deceased viz. Zain Mohomed Muss alias Zain Mohomed alias Zain Mohamed alias Zain Mohemad Muss who died at Mumbai on 08.03.2021. Copy of death certificate is annexed at Exhibit -‘A’ to the petition. Copy of the identification proof of the deceased is annexed at Exhibit “B” to the petition.

¶7

Advocate for petitioner submits that the said deceased ordinarily resided at Flat No. 10,Franconia Building, 4th floor, Dubash Estate, 3rd Pasta Lane, Colaba, Mumbai - 400005 1 and/ or left property within Greater Mumbai.

¶8

Advocate for petitioner submits that, the said deceased died intestate and that due and diligent search has been made for the Will but none has been found.

¶9

2 TP-5023 of 2024

¶10

Advocate for petitioner submits that the legal heirs left behind by the deceased surviving as his only heirs nextof-kin according to Mohemmedan Law applicable to Khoja Shia Muslim are mentioned in para no. 4 of the said petition.

¶11

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the parents of the deceased predeceased the deceased. The said Deceased during his life had divorced his Wife Mrs. Veena wife of Zain Mohomed, hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit 'C’ is Photo Copy of Decree of Divorce dated 2-12001 passed by Sixth Family Court Mumbai at Bandra in Petition No. F- 700 of 2000.

¶12

Advocate for petitioner submits that the deceased left behind him only son viz. Sohail Nathani Son of Zain Mohomed. Save and except there are no other legal heirs and next of kind left by the deceased, which is mentioned at para no. 4 of the petition.

¶13

Advocate for Petitioner submits that being the only son of deceased claims to be entitled for full share in the estate left by the deceased.

¶14

Advocate for petitioner submits that, there is no impediment under Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or under any other provision of this Act or any

¶15

3 TP-5023 of 2024

¶16

other enactment to the grant of the certificate of the validity thereof if it was granted.

¶17

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court or District Delegate or to any High Court for probate of any Will of the said deceased or for letters of administration with or without the Will for annexed to their property and credits.

¶18

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court for Succession Certificate in respect of any debt or security belonging to the estate of the deceased.

¶19

Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is delay of filing this petition be condoned as the concerned authorities asked for legal representation to transfer the property in favour of the Legal heirs. In view thereof, delay is condoned.

¶20

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the General Notice was issued on 14.11.2024 in the aforesaid matter. Advocate for the petitioner submits that Affidavit of Service dated 27.11.2024 for proving General Notice filed through e-filing.

¶21

Pursuant to order dated 28.02.2023 passed by Hon’ble Shri Justice Arif S. Doctor, in Testamentary Petition No. 2556 of 2022 and Testamentary petition No. 2559 of

¶22

4 TP-5023 of 2024

¶23

2022 directions were given to the Registry, in all matters for Letters of Administration and Succession Certificate, whenever there is sole legal heir, who is Class -I legal heir, Registry is directed to not to insist for filing/furnishing of Administration Bond. Hence, as per direction of the Hon’ble Court filing of Administration Bond is dispensed with for the sole class I legal heir.

¶24

This petition is filed for grant of Succession Certificate in respect to the securities which was mentioned in Schedule-1 which is annexed to the petition. The petitioner has complied all the necessary compliance for grant of the Succession Certificate in favor of the petitioner. Hence, facts stated by petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order :

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Petition is allowed and the Succession Certificate be granted to the petitioner for certain securities left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format.

¶27

Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify whether any cross Petition is pending or Affidavit resisting the petition is filed.

¶28

ksa/rvr

¶29

COMPANY REGISTRAR/ TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

Sohail Nathani Son of Zain Mohomed v. Zain Mohomed Muss (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sohail Nathani Son of Zain Mohomed v. Zain Mohomed Muss (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanjiv Ramesh Rawell vs Sunanda Kailasvadan Painter (Deceased)

Rina Sanjay Kumar Pahuja vs Santosh Harikrishan Sethi Alias Santosh Sethi (Deceased)

Amit Mahesh Nanavati vs Suchita Amit Nanavati (Deceased)

Jatin Shrikant Nayak vs Moresh Ramrao Nayak (Deceased)

Rabab Behjat Hussain vs Allahrakhibai Sharafally Lakdawala (Deceased)

Ajay Mahendra Reshamwala vs Mahendra Kakubhai Reshamwala (Deceased No. 1)