Carol Albuquerque vs Simon Albuquerque (Deceased)

¶1

1 TP 4353 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

¶3

DATE : 8^th January’2025 Sr No. - 13-TP/4353/2024 (ECHCBM02045492024)

¶4

Ms. Nehal Lathi i/b. Divya Sanghvi, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶5

Called for Compliance

¶6

Perused the Petition. Heard Advocate for petitioner. Advocate for petitioner submits that the present petition is for Succession Certificate in respect of certain Securities belonging to the deceased viz. Simon Albuquerque who died at Pune on 22.12.2023. Copy of death certificate is annexed at Exhibit -‘A’ to the petition. Copy of the identification proof of the deceased is annexed at Exhibit “A1” to the petition.

¶7

Advocate for petitioner submits that the said deceased ordinarily resided at B/205, B-6, Citizen, Violet CHS, Naigaon East, Juchandra, Vasai East, Thane 401 208 and left property in the State of Maharashtra.

¶8

Pursuant to the direction passed by the Hon’ble Court in TP No. 233 of 2022 the issue of jurisdiction under section 371 of the Indian Succession Act is decided. It is decided that, this Hon’ble Court is having Jurisdiction if, the Securities/Debts lies in the Jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. This Court is having jurisdiction to proceed with

¶9

2 TP 4353 of 2024

¶10

the matter. Since, the Hon’ble Court has decided the issue of the Jurisdiction petition can be proceeded.

¶11

Advocate for petitioner submits that, the said deceased died intestate and that due and diligent search has been made for the Will but none has been found.

¶12

Advocate for petitioner submits that the legal heirs left behind by the deceased surviving as his only heirs nextof-kin according to Indian Succession Act, 1925 are mentioned in para no. 4 of the said petition.

¶13

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the parents of the deceased predeceased the deceased.

¶14

Advocate for petitioner submits that the deceased left behind him widow and son viz (1) Carol Albuquerque (widow of the deceased/petitioner herein), (2) Christopher Albuquerque (son of the deceased). Save and except there are no other legal heirs and next of kind left by the deceased, which is mentioned at para no. 4 of the petition.

¶15

Advocate for petitioner submits that Christopher Albuquerque had given his consent for issuance of succession certificate in favour of Carol Albuquerque, petitioner.

¶16

The consent affidavit of Christopher Albuquerque is annexed separately to the petition.

¶17

3 TP 4353 of 2024

¶18

Advocate for Petitioner submits that being the wife of deceased claims to be entitled for 1/2 share in the estate left by the deceased.

¶19

Advocate for petitioner submits that, there is no impediment under Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or under any other provision of this Act or any other enactment to the grant of the certificate of the validity thereof if it was granted.

¶20

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court or District Delegate or to any High Court for probate of any Will of the said deceased or for letters of administration with or without the Will for annexed to their property and credits.

¶21

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court for Succession Certificate in respect of any debt or security belonging to the estate of the deceased.

¶22

Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is delay of filing this petition be condoned as the concerned authorities asked for legal representation to transfer the property in favour of the Legal heirs. In view thereof, delay is condoned.

¶23

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the General Notice was issued on 05.10.2024 in the aforesaid matter.

¶24

4 TP 4353 of 2024

¶25

Advocate for the petitioner submits that Affidavit of Service dated 11.11.2024 for proving General Notice filed through e-filing and Administration Bond dated 24.10.2024 also filed through e-filing.

¶26

This petition is filed for grant of Succession Certificate in respect to the securities which was mentioned in Schedule-1 which is annexed to the petition. The petitioner has complied all the necessary compliance for grant of the Succession Certificate in favor of the petitioner. Hence, facts stated by petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order :

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Petition is allowed and the Succession Certificate be granted to the petitioner for certain securities left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format. Grant to be expedited.

¶29

Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify whether any cross Petition is pending or Affidavit resisting the petition is filed.

¶30

The petitioner to file an account as undertaken in the Administration Bond within stipulated period. Necessary endorsement be made on the Administration Bond, subject to satisfaction of the Department.

¶31

COMPANY REGISTRAR/ TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

¶32

ksa/rvr

Carol Albuquerque v. Simon Albuquerque (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Carol Albuquerque v. Simon Albuquerque (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kashmira Viraf Patva vs Kurush Faramroze Billimoria Alias Kurush F Billimoria Alias Kurush Framroze Billimoria

A K Toprani Alias Ashok Kumar Toprani vs Dungersey Thakersey Saraiya

Hoshang Framroz Balsara vs Shehnaz Zubin Bilimoria ( Deceased)

Beena Kinariwala vs Jayesh Indravadan Dalal - Deceased

Suresh Balram Chugani vs Lata Balram Chugani

Sudarshan Prakash Satam vs Raghunath Pandurang Satam