Laxmi Babu Jadhav vs Bodke Laxman Somakka Alias Somakka Laxman Bodke (Deceased)

¶1

1 TP 4088 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

¶3

DATE : 10^th January’2025

¶4

Sr No. - 42-TP/4088/2024

¶5

Mas. Namita Mestry, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶6

Called for Compliance:

¶7

Perused the Petition. Heard Advocate for petitioner. Advocate for petitioner submits that the present petition is for Succession Certificate in respect of certain debts belonging to the deceased viz. Somakka Laxman Bodke alias Bodke Laxman Somakka who died at Mumbai on 14.05.2020. Copy of death certificate is annexed at Exhibit -‘A’ to the petition. Copy of the identification proof of the deceased is annexed at Exhibit “A1” to the petition.

¶8

Advocate for petitioner submits that the said deceased ordinarily resided at Amnboli Ramesh Nagar, Makad Pada, Andheri (West), Greater Mumbai, Mumbai 400058and left property within Greater Bombay and in the State of Maharashtra.

¶9

Advocate for petitioner submits that, the said deceased died intestate and that due and diligent search has been made for the Will but none has been found.

¶10

2 TP 4088 of 2024

¶11

Advocate for petitioner submits that the legal heirs left behind by the deceased surviving as her only heirs next-of-kin according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956 are mentioned in para no. 4 of the said petition.

¶12

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the parents of the deceased predeceased the deceased. The husband of the deceased predeceased the deceased.

¶13

Advocate for petitioner submits that the deceased left behind her sister viz. Laxmi Babu Jadhav (sister of the deceased/petitioner herein). Save and except there are no other legal heirs and next of kind left by the deceased, which is mentioned at para no. 4 of the petition.

¶14

Advocate for Petitioner submits that being the only sister of deceased claims to be entitled for full share in the estate left by the deceased.

¶15

Advocate for petitioner submits that, there is no impediment under Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or under any other provision of this Act or any other enactment to the grant of the certificate of the validity thereof if it was granted.

¶16

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court or District Delegate or to any High Court for probate of any Will of the said

¶17

3 TP 4088 of 2024

¶18

deceased or for letters of administration with or without the Will for annexed to their property and credits.

¶19

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court for Succession Certificate in respect of any debt or security belonging to the estate of the deceased.

¶20

Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is delay of filing this petition be condoned as the concerned authorities asked for legal representation to transfer the property in favour of the Legal heirs. In view thereof, delay is condoned.

¶21

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the General Notice was issued on 05.09.2024 in the aforesaid matter. Advocate for the petitioner submits that Affidavit of Service dated 28.10.2024 for proving General Notice filed through e-filing.

¶22

Advocate for the petitioner submits that “pursuant to the order dated 2.2.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale, in Testamentary Petition No. 2918 of 2023, direction was given to the Registry in case of all the surviving legal heirs of the deceased are petitioners before the Court and the right or interest of no other legal heir is required to be protected, the department shall not insist on furnishing Administration Bond. Hence, Administration Bond is dispensed with”.

¶23

4 TP 4088 of 2024

¶24

This petition is filed for grant of Succession Certificate in respect to the debts which was mentioned in Schedule-1 which is annexed to the petition. The petitioner has complied all the necessary compliance for grant of the Succession Certificate in favor of the petitioner. Hence, facts stated by petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order :

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Petition is allowed and the Succession Certificate be granted to the petitioner for certain debts left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format.

¶27

Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify whether any cross Petition is pending or Affidavit resisting the petition is filed.

¶28

ksa/rvr

¶29

COMPANY REGISTRAR/ TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

Laxmi Babu Jadhav v. Bodke Laxman Somakka Alias Somakka Laxman Bodke (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxmi Babu Jadhav v. Bodke Laxman Somakka Alias Somakka Laxman Bodke (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Milind Janardhan Nirgun vs Sneha Milind Nirgun (Deacesed)

Nikhil Keshav Salian vs Yashoda Keshav Salian (Decased)

Srabani Ravindra Kapoor nee Srabani Lajpat Dutta and Anr. vs Prosenjit Lajpat Dutta (Deceased)

Sanam Sultan Ali Nassur vs Feroza Mustak Rafik

Teenaz W/O Dinyar Siganporia vs Noshir Faeamroze Colabavala Alias Noshir Framroze Colabavala-Deceased 1

Leela Budhaji Gomane vs Suresh Ganpat Chougule (Deceased)