Pravar Ravindranath Koticha vs Sushila Ravindranath Koticha Alias Sushila Ravindranath(Deceased)

¶1

1 TP 1704 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

¶3

DATE : 13^th January’2025 Sr No. - 19- TP/1704/2024 (ECHCBM02092062023)

¶4

Mr. Wilson Cherian i/b. Rony Wilson, Advocate the petitioner.

¶5

Called for Compliance

¶6

Perused the Petition. Heard Advocate for petitioner. Advocate for petitioner submits that the present petition is for Succession Certificate in respect of certain securities and debts belonging to the deceased viz. Sushila Ravindranath Koticha alias Sushila Ravindranath who died at Mumbai on 01.11.2011 . Copy of death certificate is annexed at Exhibit -‘A’ to the petition. Copy of the identification proof of the deceased is annexed at Exhibit “A1” to the petition.

¶7

Advocate for petitioner submits that the said deceased ordinarily resided at 2 Room No.17/18, Prabhu Prerana, Plot No. 129, Vallabh Baug Lane, Ghatkopar East, Rajawadi S.0, Mumbai-400077 and left property with Greater Bombay, in the State of Maharashtra and elsewhere in India.

¶8

Advocate for petitioner submits that, the said deceased died intestate and that due and diligent search has been made for the Will but none has been found.

¶9

2 TP 1704 of 2024

¶10

Advocate for petitioner submits that the legal heirs left behind by the deceased surviving as her only heirs nextof-kin according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956 are mentioned in para no. 4 of the said petition.

¶11

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the parents of the deceased predeceased the deceased. The husband of the deceased died on 14.11.2019.

¶12

Advocate for petitioner submits that the deceased left behind her son viz. Pravar Ravindranath Koticha (son of the deceased/petitioner herein). Save and except there are no other legal heirs and next of kind left by the deceased, which is mentioned at para no. 4 of the petition.

¶13

Advocate for Petitioner submits that being the son of deceased claims to be entitled for full share in the estate left by the deceased.

¶14

Advocate for petitioner submits that, there is no impediment under Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or under any other provision of this Act or any other enactment to the grant of the certificate of the validity thereof if it was granted.

¶15

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court or District Delegate or to any High Court for probate of any Will of the said deceased or for

¶16

3 TP 1704 of 2024

¶17

letters of administration with or without the Will for annexed to their property and credits.

¶18

Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court for Succession Certificate in respect of any debt or security belonging to the estate of the deceased.

¶19

Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is delay of filing this petition be condoned as the concerned authorities asked for legal representation to transfer the property in favour of the Legal heirs. In view thereof, delay is condoned.

¶20

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the General Notice was issued on 06.04.2024 in the aforesaid matter. Advocate for the petitioner submits that Affidavit of Service through Bailiff, Deputy Sheriff of Mumbai dated 14.08.2024 and Administration Bond dated 20.08.2024 also filed through e-filing.

¶21

Pursuant to order dated 28.02.2023 passed by Hon’ble Shri Justice Arif S. Doctor, in Testamentary Petition No. 2556 of 2022 and Testamentary petition No. 2559 of 2022 directions were given to the Registry, in all matters for Letters of Administration and Succession Certificate, whenever there is sole legal heir, who is Class -I legal heir, Registry is directed to not to insist for filing/furnishing of Administration Bond. Hence, as per direction of the Hon’ble Court filing of

¶22

4 TP 1704 of 2024

¶23

Administration Bond is dispensed with for the sole class I legal heir.

¶24

This petition is filed for grant of Succession Certificate in respect to the securities and debts which was mentioned in Schedule-1 which is annexed to the petition. The petitioner has complied all the necessary compliance for grant of the Succession Certificate in favor of the petitioner. Hence, facts stated by petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order :

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Petition is allowed and the Succession Certificate be granted to the petitioner for certain securities and debts left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format.

¶27

Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify whether any cross Petition is pending or Affidavit resisting the petition is filed.

¶28

ksa/rvr

¶29

COMPANY REGISTRAR/ TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

Pravar Ravindranath Koticha v. Sushila Ravindranath Koticha Alias Sushila Ravindranath(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravar Ravindranath Koticha v. Sushila Ravindranath Koticha Alias Sushila Ravindranath(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanam Sultan Ali Nassur vs Feroza Mustak Rafik

Teenaz W/O Dinyar Siganporia vs Noshir Faeamroze Colabavala Alias Noshir Framroze Colabavala-Deceased 1

Leela Budhaji Gomane vs Suresh Ganpat Chougule (Deceased)

Pravin Shantilal Shah vs Shantilal Sukhlal Shah (Decased)

Pravar Ravindranath Koticha vs Ravindra Joyuntilal Koticha Alias Ravindra Jayantilal Alias Ravindranath Joyuntilal Koticha

Mahesh Ishwarlal Kanakia vs Pushpa Ishwarlal Kanakia Deceased