Second appeal settled amicably by the parties through Consent Terms executed voluntarily. The Court took the Consent Terms on record, marked them 'X', allowed the appeal in accordance with the terms, and accepted the undertakings therein as undertakings to the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31-SA-503-2024.DOC
Arun Sankpal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 503 OF 2024
Runwal Developers Pvt Ltd ..Appellant Versus Shanta Talukdar …Respondent
Mr. Abir Patel, with Kartik Joshi, i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co, for the Appellant.
Mr. Vikramjit Garewal, i/b Ruturaj V Bankar, for the Respondent. Ms. Sujata Satish Rao, Authorized Signatory of the Appellant present in Court.
Smt. Shanta Talukdar, the Respondent present through VC.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 17th DECEMBER 2025
ORAL ORDER:
amicably resolved the dispute and Consent Terms have been executed. The learned Counsel seek leave to tender the Consent Terms.
Leave granted.
ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL
Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2025.12.18 11:08:27 +0530
present before the Court. Ms. Shanta Talukdar, the Respondent is present through video conferencing. The authorized representative of the Appellant-Company and the Respondent, state that they have read
1/2
31-SA-503-2024.DOC
and understood the contents of the Consent Terms, and they admit the contents and execution thereof. The parties are identified by their respective Advocates. A resolution passed by the Appellant-Company is annexed to the Consent Terms.
Terms “X”.
2/2
Runwal Developers Pvt Ltd
Shanta Talukdar
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
