Dismissed¶¶12
Sunil Ramchandra Mirgal v. Raghunath Ramchandra Mirgal
Bombay HCSA/232/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second Appeals Nos. 233 and 232 of 2020 (with Civil Applications Nos. 225 and 224 of 2020), High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur; Sunil Ramchandra Mirgal (Appellant) v. Raghunath Ramchandra Mirgal (Respondent); decided 3 November 2025 by S. G. Chapalgaonkar, J. Both appeals dismissed as abated on the legal heirs' affidavit of disinterest in prosecuting the appeal (affidavit marked 'X'); interim applications disposed accordingly. Keywords: abatement of appeal, legal heirs, disinterest in prosecution, affidavit, dismissal of appeal, Kolhapur Bench.
What did the court decide?
On the information that the legal heirs of the Appellants are not interested in prosecuting the Appeal (supported by affidavit), both Appeals stand dismissed. ¶¶12