Rama Chandu Bhikawade. v. Pandit Jalbaji Urade.
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural/default-disposal order; no substantive ratio. Keywords: dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of appellant; default dismissal; Second Appeal; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; Abhay J. Mantri, J.; Pandit Jalbaji Urade v. Rama Chandu Bhusawade; connected Second Appeal No. 223 of 1994; registry 940.SA.274.1994; neutral citation 2025:BHC-AUG:34936; decided 12-12-2025. No statute or precedent cited; no amount awarded; limited citational value save as an instance of dismissal for non-prosecution after three consecutive defaults.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal No. 274 of 1994 is dismissed for want of prosecution: none appeared for the appellant on 18 November 2025, 28 November 2025 and 12 December 2025 despite successive listings for dismissal, and the Court found the appellant not interested in pursuing the matter.