Allowed¶14
Parviz Ahemad Kazi Abdul Raoof. v. Syed Yousufuddin Bhanuddin .
Bombay HCSA/120/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), Second Appeal No. 120 of 1996, decided 12-02-2025 by R. M. Joshi, J. Parties: Parviz Ahemad Kazi Abdul Raoof (appellant, through A. N. Nagargoje) v. Syed Yousufuddin Bhanuddin (respondent, through R. R. Lute h/f G. K. Naik Thigle). Compromise decree: suit R.C.S. No. 436/1981 (specific performance of contract) decreed in terms of compromise; impugned orders set aside; compromise terms treated as part of the decree; voluntariness verified by Learned Registrar (Judicial). No statutes or precedents cited; no monetary quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Impugned orders set aside; suit R.C.S. No. 436/1981 decreed in terms of the compromise between the parties; the terms of the compromise treated as part of the decree. ¶14