Smt. Vaibhavi Vishal Pimple v. Ashok Baburav Vade and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition rejected by Bombay High Court (Amit Borkar, J.) in R.P. No.111/2024 arising out of W.P. No.1917/2024. Key concepts: error apparent on the face of the record; tax receipts as material documents; factum of disqualification; appreciation of material versus reviewable error; disposal of interim application as infructuous. Useful for searches on when non-consideration of documents amounts to an error apparent warranting review, and on standards for rejection of review petitions before the Bombay High Court. No statute or precedent was cited in the judgment text.
What did the court decide?
The consideration of tax receipts, in the context of factum of disqualification, is a matter lying in the realm of appreciation of material and cannot be termed an error apparent on the face of the record. ¶1