Nikhil Wadke v. Freddy K. Bhadha and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; M.M. Sathaye, J.; decided 30.09.2025. Review Petitions Nos. 5-7 of 2025 by Nikhil Wadke against respondents including Freddy K. Bhadha, Frenny F. Bhadha and Sabina Khana dismissed. Keywords: review jurisdiction; error apparent on face of record; re-argument not permissible; Transfer of Property Act 1882 Sections 52, 53, 60; Order XXI Rule 41(1)(b) CPC; Trial Court order dated 24.09.2024; First Appeals Nos. 1954, 1955, 1968 of 2024; advocates Anil D’Souza, Vishwajeet Kapse.
What did the court decide?
The contention that the application of Sections 52, 53 and 60 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in the order under review is erroneous is nothing but an attempt to re-argue the case and cannot be permitted in the limited review jurisdiction. ¶41