Disposed¶19

Radheshyam Dattarao Bhoje v. Shailesh Tukaram Damble

Bombay HC17 Jan 2025REVN/192/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal revision; Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; cancellation of non-bailable warrant; suspension of sentence conditional on deposit; failure to deposit within stipulated period; permission to deposit refused by Appellate Court; subsequent deposit before High Court; withdrawal of deposited amount by complainant/non-applicant; Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. compensation; Summary Criminal Case No.214/2023; Additional Sessions Judge Pusad; District Yavatmal; default sentence simple imprisonment.

What did the court decide?

Cancellation of the non-bailable warrant issued by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, District Yavatmal, and permission to the non-applicant to withdraw the amount deposited by the applicant before this Court. ¶19

Radheshyam Dattarao Bhoje Vs Shailesh Tukaram Damble — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:589

¶2

18.revn.192.2024.Judgmenrt.odt

¶3

( 1 )

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.192 OF 2024

¶6

Radhshyam Dattarao Bhoje, Aged about 60 Years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Injigo Colony, Gandhi Nagar, Pusad, Taluka Pusad, District Yavatmal. ..... APPLICANT

¶7

// VERSUS //

¶8

Shailesh Tukaram Damble, Aged about 62 Years, Occupation : Retired, R/o. Mahadeo Mandir, Subhash Ward, Pusad, Taluka Pusad, District Yavatmal. .... NON-APPLICANT

¶9

- - - - Mr. R. S. Kurekar, Counsel for Applicant. Mr. Amol Deshpande, Counsel for the Non-applicant.

¶10

¶11

CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 17.01.2025

¶12

ORAL JUDGMENT :

¶13

By preferring this revision, applicant has challenged the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, District Yavatmal, rejecting the application for seeking permission to deposit the amount of Rs.60,000/- before it and issued the non-bailable warrant against the present applicant.

¶14

It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the present applicant has preferred an appeal against the Judgment and order of sentence passed in Summary Criminal Case

¶15

18.revn.192.2024.Judgmenrt.odt

¶16

( 2 )

¶17

No.214/2023 dated 20.02.2024 thereby convicted the applicant to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of four months and also directing him to pay compensation under Section 357(3) of Cr.P.C. to the tune of Rs.4,00,000 in 4 equal installment of each within two months from the date of order. In default, shall suffer simple imprisonment.

¶18

While suspending the sentence, the learned trial Court directed to deposit Rs.80,000/- within the period of ten days. The applicant had already deposited the amount of Rs.20,000/-, but he could not deposit the amount of Rs.60,000/- during the stipulated period and subsequently, he filed an application before the Appellate Court for seeking permission to deposit the amount which was rejected and non-bailable warrant was issued. During the pendency of this application, the applicant has already deposited the amount of Rs.60,000/- before this Court. Considering this fact, the non-applicant is permitted to withdraw the amount which is deposited by the present applicant and non-bailable warrant issued by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, District Yavatmal, is hereby cancelled in the above terms.

¶19

The revision application is disposed of.

¶20

(URMIL A JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)

¶21

Sarkate.

Radheshyam Dattarao Bhoje v. Shailesh Tukaram Damble

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radheshyam Dattarao Bhoje v. Shailesh Tukaram Damble

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pratik S/O Kanhaiyalal Bansal and Another Vs the State of Mha. Thr. Pso Shegaon Dist.Buldhana and Another

Harish @ Roshan S/O Bhaskar Karnewar vs Leelavati @ Reena W/O Roshan Karnewar and Another

Mustaqeem Ahmed S/O Mushtaque Ahmed vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pos, Akot City, Akot Tq. Akot Dist. Akola and Another

Vinod Ramdasji Charde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Sakoli Dist Bhandara and Another

Rohit S/O Raghunath Battashankar Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station Rajura, Chandrapur

Ganesh S/O Babanrao Dhumal Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Gadge Nagar, Amravati, Tq. and Dist. Amravati