Sudarshan S/O Keshavji Bagde Vs Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra, Mumbai and Others

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:9087-DB 984-PIL-28-2025.odt 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 28 OF 2025.

¶4

Sudarshan s/o Keshavji Bagde .. Petitioner

¶5

versus

¶6

Chief Secretary-State of Maharashtra and ` .. Respondents two others.

¶7

Mr. S. T. Chauhan, Advocate for petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Sunil Manohar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hrishikesh Marathe, for respondents/State Mr. Anand Jaiswal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yash Kullarwar, Advocate for intervenor. Mr. A. Joseph, Advocate, for intervenor through Video Conferencing.

¶9

Mr. Bajaj, Advocate with Mr. Bhavin Suchak, for intervenor through Video Conferencing.

¶10

CORAM :- ANIL S. KILOR and RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATE :- 9^th SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶11

P. C.

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶13

The issue which is sought to be canvassed in the present Public Interest Litigation is relating to the procurement of the High Security Registration Plate (HSRP) and third registration mark on motor vehicles. Pursuant to the amendment to Rule 50 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 (for short, ‘Motor Vehicles Rules’), it is now necessary to install the HSRP.

¶14

3 The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of M.C.Mehta vs. Union of India in Writ Petition (C) No.13029 of 1985 decided on 13.08.2018 passed an order thereby directing affixing of hologram based stickers of light blue colour in case of petrol/CNG vehicles and a hologram based stickers of orange colour for diesel vehicles. The directions were to implement the same by 02.10.2018 in National Capital Region, pursuant to the amendment in Rule 50 of the Motor Vehicle Rules.

¶15

2

¶16

984-PIL-28-2025.odt

¶17

As per mandate of the Motor Vehicles Rules, the exercise has been undertaken by the States for the installation of HSRP at the cost of the vehicle owners.

¶18

It is the case of the petitioner that in a news paper article published in hindi daily ‘Lokmat Samachar’ the cost of number plate (HSRP) for two wheelers, three wheelers, four wheelers and heavy vehicles are provided. As per the rates provided in the said news paper article, the charges prescribed in the State of Maharashtra for installation of HSRP are higher than the charges prescribed in the other States namely Andhra Pradesh, Gujrat, Jharkhand and Goa. As per the news article, the rates prescribed for installation of HSRP in the State of Maharashtra and the other States are as below:

¶19

jkT;	nksifg;k	frifg;k	dkj	Hkkjh okgu
egkjk’Vª	450	500	745	745
vka/kzizns”k	245	282	619	649
xqtjkr	160	200	460	480
>kj[kaM	300	340	540	570
xksok	155	155	203	232

¶20

In that view of the matter, this Court, while issuing notice on 04.04.2025, has directed the respondent no. 2-State Transport Commissioner to file an affidavit within a period of three weeks and to explain as to why the State of Maharashtra can not provide the HSRP at lower rate as provided by the other States named above.

¶21

In compliance with the aforesaid directions, the respondent no.2 has filed its affidavit-in-reply on 05.08.2025. The respondent no.2, while countering to the rates prescribed/quoted in the news article and as recorded by this Court in the order dated 04.04.2025, has along with its reply filed charts comparing the prices for installation of HSRP with the other States namely Gujrat, Goa and Andhra Pradesh, which are as follows:

¶22

984-PIL-28-2025.odt 3

¶23

Maharashtra and Gujarat HSRP rates excluding GST Ref: Letter of Commissioner of Transport, Gujarat No.COT/311/08/2023 dated 10.08.2023.

¶24

Sr.No.	Class of MV	Maharashtra in Rupees	Gujarat in Rupees	% Difference
1	Two Wheelers & Tractor	Rs.450/-	Rs.468/-	+4
2	Three Whellers	Rs.500/-	Rs.500/-	0.0
3	LMV/MMV/HGV	Rs.745/-	Rs.790/-	+6

¶25

Maharashtra & Goa HSRP rates excluding GST

¶26

Ref. Letter of Director of Transport, Goa, No.D.Tpt/EST/1493/2012/Part File-A/293 dt.31.01.2025

¶27

Sr.No.	Class of MV	Maharashtra in Rupees	Gujarat in Rupees	% Difference
1	Two Wheelers & Tractor	Rs.450/-	Rs.465/-	+4.7
2	Three Wheller	Rs.500/-	Rs.500/-	0.0
3	LMV/MMV/HGV	Rs.745/-	Rs.788/-	+6.5

¶28

Maharashtra & Andhra Pradesh HSRP rates excluding GST Ref. Letter of of Transport Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh, No.906666/R/2017 dated 22.08.2023

¶29

Sr.No.	Class of MV	Maharashtra in Rupees	Gujarat in Rupees	% Difference
1	Two Wheelers & Tractor	Rs.450/-	Rs.451/-	+0.3
2	Three Wheeller	Rs.500/-	Rs.500/-	0.0
3	LMV/MMV/HGV	Rs.745/-	Rs.808/-	+8.8

¶30

The above referred charts show that either the prices in Maharashtra of HSRP are similar or lessor than the prices prescribed/quoted by the other States. Thus, the grievance of the petitioner that the prices prescribed by the State of Maharashtra for installation of HSRP are higher than the prices prescribed by the other States, cannot be accepted in absence of any counter affidavit filed by the petitioner countering the information submitted by the respondent no.2 about the rates/charges for installation of HSRP in other States.

¶31

984-PIL-28-2025.odt 4

¶32

Furthermore, the aforesaid affidavit mentioning the rates prescribed for installation of HSRP in other States came to be filed on 05.08.2025 i.e. more than a month before. However, there is no counter filed by the petitioner to the same disputing the rates mentioned in the affidavit.

¶33

Thus, considering the price chart provided by the respondent no.2 in reply pointing out that the prices prescribed for installation of HSRP in the State of Maharashtra are not higher than the prices quoted/prescribed by the other States for the same work, we are of the opinion that the grievance raised by the petitioner that the prices prescribed by the State of Maharashtra for installation of HSRP are higher than the prices quoted by the other States does not survive.

¶34

In the circumstances, we do not find any merit in the present Public Interest Litigation and it is dismissed as such. No costs.

¶35

Civil Application, if any, stands, disposed of.

¶36

( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶37

Andurkar.

Sudarshan S/O Keshavji Bagde v. Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudarshan S/O Keshavji Bagde v. Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharad Ghodke vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Is Principal Sec. Dept of Urban Development and Ors.

Vishwesh Atchuta Kamat and Anr. vs the High Court of Judicature of Bombay and Others

Nilesh Tribhuvan vs State of Maharashtra

Prakruti Foundation, Thr. Its President, Deepak Bharatsingh Dixit vs Union of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi and Others

Shriniwas Gyandeorao Mundhe vs the Union of India through Its Secretary and Others

Chandrakant Shivaji Gaikwad and Anr. vs Union of India Thr Secretary of Ministry of Information and Ors.

Prakash Shankar Gaikwad vs The Union of India Through its secretary and Ors.

Rajesaheb Sahebrao Patil and Another Vs the Union of India and Others

M/S Baheti Automobiles, Akola Thr. Partner, Kamalkishore F. Baheti Vs Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi and Ors.

Samta Samudaye Mahila Bahouddeshiya Sastha, Thr. President, Dipa Amit Wasnik and Anr. Vs State of Maha., Thr. Principal Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Grand Education Society, Thr. Its Secretary, Shri. Rahul Rajendra Bhagat and Another Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary Deptt. of Revenue and Forests, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Another

Ashish Prakash Awale vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy., Dept. of State Excise, Mumbai and Ors.

Snehal Sushikshit Berojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha, Thr. President,Abdul Salam a. Wahab Sheikh Vs Vidarbha Irrigation Devept. Cor., Thr. Exe. Engineer, Water Resources Dept., Amravati and Anr.

Keshaorao Multipurpose Trust, Thr. Shri. Baban S/O. Keshaorao Kalbande , Wardha vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy., Department of School Education, Mumbai and Others