Disposed¶10
Suresh Laxman Nemade v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/107/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Aurangabad Bench, Bombay High Court; PIL 107/2018; Suresh Laxman Nemade v. State of Maharashtra; disposed of as infructuous on counsel's own statement that lapse of time rendered the petition infructuous; per curiam division bench (Venegavkar & Kankanwadi, JJ.); decided 25.11.2025; no merits, no law laid down; citable only for the fact of consensual infructuous closure, not for any proposition of law.
What did the court decide?
Accepting learned counsel's submission that with the passage of time the petition had become infructuous, the Court directed that the petition stands disposed of as infructuous; there is no adjudication on merits. ¶10