Subhash Sahebrao Nakalgaonkar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Fresh PIL seeking execution/implementation of directions already issued in earlier PIL No.5/2020 (order dated 13.01.2020) held not entertainable; such relief cannot be sought by way of another PIL even citing supervening events in implementation. Petition disposed of; petitioner's deposit ordered refunded; connected Civil Application No. 9143 of 2022 also disposed. Neutral citation: 2025:BHC-AUG:3152-DB. Decided 3 February 2025 by Mangesh S. Patil and Prafulla S. Khubalkar, JJ., Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Keywords: PIL maintainability, execution of PIL directions, supervening events, refund of deposit, per court.
What did the court decide?
Refund to the petitioner of the amount deposited by him. ¶¶20