Ashwini Pradip Bhosle Petitioner v. Late Anandi Murlidhar More (Deceased)
Case brief
What is this about?
Testamentary/intestate miscellaneous petition (Misc. Petition No. 386 of 2024; electronic file '15.MPT.386.2025.doc'), High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction. Parties: petitioner Yashraj Vikas Adarkar; respondent Suvidha Vikas Adarkar; deceased Vikas Maruti Adarkar. Counsel: Ketki Gokhale (i/by Sunil Tiwari) for petitioner; Shridhar Tajane with Kuldeep Pawar (i/by Shree Law) for respondent. Coram: Milind N. Jadhav, J.; dated 28 November 2025. Purely procedural instalment: affidavit-in-reply taken on record; rejoinder within one week; adjourned to 12 December 2025. No statutes cited, no precedents engaged, no holdings, no quantum.
What did the court decide?
No substantive adjudication; interim procedural directions only: (i) respondent's Affidavit-in-Reply taken on record, copy given to petitioner's side; (ii) rejoinder, if any, to be filed within one week with copy served on the other side; (iii) hearing stood over to 12 December 2025.