Pallavi Akshay Rangari v. Akshay Virendra Rangari

Bombay HC24 Jan 2025MCA/71/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; MCA 71/2024; transfer petition; Family Court Nagpur to Civil Judge Senior Division Gondia; divorce Petition A.679 of 2023; maintenance application before JMFC Gondia; applicant's health condition, attendance with escort; non-applicant residing at London, power of attorney to father; appearance through video conferencing; coram Vrushali V. Joshi, J.; decided 24 January 2025; application allowed; counsel Y.R. Chaugule (applicant), K.Y. Mandpe (non-applicant).

What did the court decide?

Transfer of Petition A. No.679 of 2023 from the file of Family Court, Nagpur to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Gondia; the civil application stands disposed of. ¶¶19

Pallavi Akshay Rangari vs Akshay Virendra Rangari — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

59-mca 71-24.odt

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 71 OF 2024

¶5

Pallavi Akshay Rangari -Vs-Akshay Virendra Rangari

¶6

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Court's or Judge's Orders.

¶8

¶9

Mr.Y.R.Chaugule, counsel for the applicant. Mr. K.Y.Mandpe, counsel for non-applicant.

¶10

CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATE : 24^th JANUARY, 2025.

¶11

The applicant has filed this application to transfer the petition A.679 of 2023 pending on the file of Family Court, Nagpur to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Gondia, which is filed by the non-applicant for divorce.

¶12

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant has stated that the applicant is staying at Gondia. She has filed the application for maintenance before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gondia. She is staying at Gondia. Due to her health condition, she has to attend the Court along with escort. The non-applicant is staying at London and he has given power of attorney to his father.

¶13

The learned counsel appearing for the nonapplicant has stated that the applicant is staying at London and he can appear through Video Conferencing at any Court, if the permission is granted to attend the

Kavita

59-mca 71-24.odt

2/2

proceedings through Video Conferencing, he has no objection to transfer the matter from Family Court, Nagpur to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division at Gondia.

¶18

4. Heard both the learned counsel.

¶19

As the non-applicant is not staying in Nagpur and is ready to appear through Video Conferencing before the District Court at Gondia and considering the health condition of the applicant, the application is allowed.

¶20

The Petition A. No.679 of 2023 pending on the file of Family Court, Nagpur be transferred to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Gondia.

¶21

7. Civil Application stands disposed of.

¶22

JUDGE

¶23

Signed by: Kavita P Tayade Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Kavita Date: 24/01/2025 17:56:43

Pallavi Akshay Rangari v. Akshay Virendra Rangari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pallavi Akshay Rangari v. Akshay Virendra Rangari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shamshad Parveen W/O Shaikh Aslam Vs Shaikh Aslam Shaikh Rahim

Roshni Tushar Ingole Vs Tushar Sahebrao Ingole

Mayuri W/O Yashdeep Nimje vs Yashdeep S/O Purshottam Nimje and Others

Shardul Damodar Pujari Thr. P.O.A. Holder Damodar S/O Motilalji Pujari Father of the Petitioner Vs Revati W/O Shardul Pujari

Sau. Swarup W/O Rahul Badole Vs Rahul Manik Badole

Durga Amol Khodake Vs Amol Madhukarrao Khodake