Dismissed¶18

Kailash Fakira Lahase v. Bodhisalva Edu. Society, Buldhana Thr. Its President and Others

Bombay HC25 Nov 2025MCA/157/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench — MCA (Review) No.157 of 2023 in W.P. No.2586 of 2008 (D), Kailash Fakira Lahase v. Bodhisatva Education Society and Others; review of order dated 15.03.2018 in WP 2586/2008 dismissed on 25.11.2025 by Siddheshwar S. Thombre, J.; no apparent error on the face of the record made out; plea of bias against Enquiry Committee member (raised in School Tribunal appeal) did not yield interference; no order as to costs; no statutes or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

On perusal of the order dated 15.03.2018 in Writ Petition No.2586 of 2008, there is no reason to interfere with it, as the applicant has not pointed out any apparent error on the face of the record; accordingly the review application fails. ¶17

Kailash Fakira Lahase Vs Bodhisalva Edu. Society, Buldhana Thr. Its President and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:12921

¶2

20 MCA-157-2023

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO.157 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2586 OF 2008 (D)

¶6

[Kailash Fakira Lahase ..Vs.. Bodhisatva Education Society and Others]

¶7

______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

¶8

appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

¶9

Mr S. P. Rajurkar, Adv. h/f Mr A. Parchure, Advocate for Applicant. Mr Apurva De, Advocate for Non-Applicant Nos.1 and 2. Ms M. R. Kavimandan, AGP for Respondent/State.

¶10

CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 25th N OVEMBER, 2025.

¶11

. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

By way of this application, the applicant seeks review of the order dated 15.03.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2586 of 2008.

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicant contended that this Court in its order dated 15.03.2018 committed an apparent error on the face of the record by recording a contrary finding. He further submitted that although there was a specific issue of bias on the part of a member of the Enquiry Committee, which was raised in the memo of appeal preferred before the School Tribunal, this Court did not deal with that issue while deciding the matter.

¶14

He also submitted that the findings recorded are contrary to the facts on record. Therefore, on that ground, he prayed that the order dated 15.03.2018 passed by this Court be reviewed.

¶15

20 MCA-157-2023

¶16

¶17

I have perused the application and the contentions therein. Upon perusal of the order dated 15.03.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 2586 of 2008, I do not find any reason to interfere with the said order, as the applicant has not pointed out any apparent error on the face of the record.

¶18

In view of that Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.157 of 2023 is dismissed . No order as to cost.

¶19

(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)

¶20

TAMBE

Kailash Fakira Lahase v. Bodhisalva Edu. Society, Buldhana Thr. Its President and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Fakira Lahase v. Bodhisalva Edu. Society, Buldhana Thr. Its President and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vandana Manohar Hingmire Vs Akola Urban Education Society, Akola Thr. President and Others

Hariom Navodaya Bahu Uddeshiya Sanstha ,Sawangi(Meghe),Thr. President Pawan Kumar Vallabhdas Bhatta Vs Municipal Council, Ashti (Sha), Wardha, through Its Chief Officer

Mahadev S/O Ramrao Pardhi and Another Vs the Tahsildar, Darwha, Yavatmal and Another

Shri. Krishnarao Ajbrao Bhise (Since Deceased) Thr. His Lrs. vs Shankar Maroti Kulsange and Others

Mahesh Sahebrao Yadav vs Yeshwant Shikshan Sanstha Chandrapur, Thr. President and Others

Smt. Kiranrani Wd/O Suryakant Chaurasiya vs State of Maharashtra, through Joint Secretary Home Department, Mumbai and Another