Harsshil Shailesh Shah v. Gautam Ratan Sonawane
Case brief
What is this about?
Leave to file appeal refused — Bombay HC (O.O.), Division Bench (B. P. Colabawalla & Amit S. Jamsandekar, JJ.), 10.10.2025 — IA No.3693 of 2025 in Appeal (L) No.18052 of 2025 — Harsshil Shailesh Shah & Ors. v. Gautam Ratan Sonawane & Anr. Non-party applicants to testamentary proceedings (TP No.890/2010 / TS No.34/2011 / IA No.1/2019); two claimed properties brought into the proceedings via amendment; inclusion does not affect applicants' rights, if any; remedy lies in appropriate proceedings to establish right, title and interest; appeal held misconceived; application dismissed, no order as to costs. Impugned: Single Judge order dated 14.10.2020 in IA No.1/2019 in TS No.34/2011 in TP No.890/2010. Counsel: Cyrus Ardeshir, Senior Advocate (with R.D. Suryawanshi, Suraj N. Naik) for Applicants/Appellants; E.A. Sasi (with Bijoy Chacko, Tejas Shinde) for Respondent No.2.
What did the court decide?
This court held that the Appeal itself challenging the order dated 14.10.2020 is wholly misconceived.