Allowed¶25

Neamat Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

Bombay HC23 Jan 2025IA/3556/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of writ petition dismissed for non-removal of office objections; condonation of 217 days' delay; conditional costs of Rs.10,000/- to High Court Law Library; removal of office objections within four weeks; Neamat Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr.; Interim Application No.3556 of 2024 in Writ Petition (L) No.16172 of 2021; Bombay High Court O.O.C.J.; Gadkari and Khata, JJ.; 23-01-2025.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of Writ Petition (L) No.16172 of 2021 in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c), subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs to the High Court Law Library within two weeks of uploading of the Order, and removal of office objections within four weeks from the date of payment of costs. ¶25

Neamat Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶25

Issue for consideration

Whether the delay of 217 days in filing the application for restoration of Writ Petition (L) No.16172 of 2021 should be condoned. +1 more

¶21

Court's answer

The delay of 217 days stands condoned subject to the Applicant paying costs of Rs.10,000/- to the High Court Law Library, Room No.39, 2nd Floor, Main Building, High Court, Bombay, within two weeks from the date of uploading of the Order; the Applicant's statement offering such costs is accepted.

¶24

Ratio / Principle

Subject to payment of the costs within the stipulated period, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c), i.e., the Writ Petition is restored.

¶25

Key takeaways

The Applicant is directed to remove office objections within four weeks from the date of payment of the aforenoted costs to the High Court Law Library.ratio¶26

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction), Coram A. S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, JJ., by order dated 23 January 2025, allowed Interim Application No.3556 of 2024 filed by Neamat Developers Pvt. Ltd. seeking restoration of Writ Petition (L) No.16172 of 2021, which had been dismissed for non-removal of office objections in furtherance of a notice dated 8th March, 2024. The delay of 217 days in filing the restoration application was condoned subject to the Applicant paying costs of Rs.10,000/- to the High Court Law Library, Room No.39, 2nd Floor, Main Building, High Court, Bombay, within two weeks from the date of uploading of the Order. Subject to such payment, the application was allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c), and the Applicant was directed to remove office objections within four weeks from the date of payment of the costs.

Neamat Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neamat Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Pvt. Ltd. vs Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board and Anr.

Madrassa Masjid Gausiya a Public Trust vs State of Maharashtra through Urban Development

Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd. vs Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Department ) of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj

Suchir Sunil Bhandari vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay through Its Secretary

Subhash Murlidhar Korde vs the State of Maharashtra

Jeetnarayan Udit Yadav vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai