Anuradha Sharma v. Anuj Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural adjournment order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Madhav J. Jamdar, J., 06 February 2025. Parties: Anuradha Sharma (petitioner, counsel Mandar Soman/Meenakshi Pahuja/ANB Legal; Abhijit Sarwate discharged) v. Anuj Sharma (respondent/petitioner in contempt petitions, counsel Rohan Cama and team/Ajinkya Udane); Union of India is Respondent No.3 (Y. R. Mishra/D. P. Singh). Matters clubbed: WP 13561/2024, WP 6569/2022, CP 326/2023, CP 487/2023, CP(ST) 18611/2023, CP(ST) 33234/2023 and interim applications. Directions: discharge of counsel; reply to IA (filed 29.01.2025, served 04.02.2025 ~10:45 pm) by 12.02.2025; stand over 13.02.2025. No statutes, precedents, issues or holdings; cite only for procedural history, not for any legal principle.
What did the court decide?
Procedural directions only: (i) Mr. Abhijit Sarwate discharged as counsel for the Petitioner; (ii) time granted to the Respondent's counsel in WP 6569/2022 to file Reply to the Interim Application (filed 29 January 2025, served 4 February 2025) on or before 12 February 2025; (iii) matters stand over to 13 February 2025. Nothing decided on merits.