Raju Ambadas Salunke v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Condonation of delay; petitioner expired during COVID pandemic; substitution/legal representatives permitted to come on record and prosecute writ petitions; interim applications allowed and disposed; amendments within 2 weeks; Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; bench of M.S. Sonak and Jitendra Jain JJ.; Writ Petition No. 8789 of 2012 with IA 13876 of 2023 and Writ Petition No. 9234 of 2016 with IA 7721 of 2023; applicant Raju Ambadas Saluke; petitioner Shri Ambadas Balbhim Salunke; respondents the State of Maharashtra and others; counsel Ms Gunjan Shah, Mr A P Shinde, A R Deolekar AGP, Mr Shailesh V More.
What did the court decide?
Delay condoned; Interim Applications No. 13876 of 2023 and No. 7721 of 2023 allowed and disposed of, permitting the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner to come on record and prosecute Writ Petition No. 8789 of 2012 and Writ Petition No. 9234 of 2016; necessary amendments to be carried out within two weeks.