Allowed¶5
Krushna Tatya Katte and Anr. v. the State of Maha. Thr. Sec. of Revenue Dept. and Ors.
Bombay HCIA/12842/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
IA 12842/2024 in WP 494/2019, Krushna Tatya Katte v State of Maharashtra, Bombay HC Kolhapur Circuit Bench, decision 10 Nov 2025, Karnik & Kadethankar JJ. — condonation of 39-day delay in filing application to bring legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 8(a) on record; heirs Respondent Nos. 8(b) to 8(g) already on record; application allowed in terms of prayer clause (b); amendment within two weeks; no statute or precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of the 39-day delay in filing; legal heirs of Respondent No. 8(a) permitted to be brought on record in terms of prayer clause (b); amendment to be carried out within two weeks. ¶5