Rahul Dadasaheb Ballal v. The State of Maharashtra and others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), Contempt Petition No. 721 of 2025 in WP/4407/2025, decided 20-09-2025 by Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Vaishali Patil Jadhav, JJ. Petitioner Rahul Dadasaheb Ballal vs State of Maharashtra (AGP K. S. Patil; petitioner's advocate Deepak Dayaram Choudhari). Non-compliance alleged of order dated 02/04/2025 in Writ Petition No.4407/2025 directing the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's claim within 30 days; AGP's statement that the claim would be decided within two weeks recorded as undertaking; contempt petition disposed of. No statutory or precedent citations; no costs or quantum.
What did the court decide?
Statement of the learned AGP that the petitioner's claim would be decided within two weeks was recorded as an undertaking to the Court, and the contempt petition was disposed of on that basis.