Konark Sevabhavi Sanstha, Hingoli v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitions disposed as infructuous; passage of time; inquiry under Contempt of Courts Act not feasible; Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court; single Judge Arun R. Pedneker; disposed off on petitioners' counsel submission (R.K. Ashtekar holding for S.G. Rudrawar); AGP V.K. Kotecha for State; connected writs WP/1062/2011, WP/7472/2010, WP/1553/2011; no merits adjudication; no amounts.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petitions disposed of as infructuous on the petitioners' counsel's submission; no further inquiry under the Contempt of Courts Act directed. ¶22