Disposed¶17
Rahul Sandu Ankushe and Others v. Sunil Vinodrai Raithatha and Another
Bombay HCCP/188/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt petitions (CONT. PETITION Nos. 188 & 192 of 2018) arising out of Writ Petitions 8024/2017 and 8027/2017; petitioners Rahul Sandu Ankushe and others vs respondents Sunil Vinodrai Raithatha and another; decided 25 September 2025 by Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench (coram: Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Vaishali Patil–Jadhav, JJ.); disposed of as infructuous upon dismissal of the main writ petitions; neutral citation 2025:BHC-AUG:26895-DB; advocates: Anagha Pandit (petitioners), U. S. Bhosale AGP (State), D. A. Karnik h/f K. M. Suryawanshi (respondents 1 and 2).
What did the court decide?
Since the main writ petitions themselves stand dismissed, the contempt petitions alleging contempt of the interim orders are disposed of as infructuous. ¶17