Lilesh S/O Ramesh Daddamwar v. the Vice-Chairman/Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Bombay HC29 Sept 2025CAW/2220/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; Civil Applications No.2222, 2221 and 2220 of 2025 in Writ Petition No.5545 of 2022 (Lilesh s/o Ramesh Daddamwar v. Vice-Chairman and Member Secretary, S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur); condonation of delay of 281 days; death of petitioner on 09/12/2024; abatement set aside; legal heirs brought on record; amendment within one week; AGP no objection; decided September 29, 2025 by Smt. M.S. Jawalkar and Raj D. Wakode, JJ.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 281 days in filing the application for bringing legal heirs on record condoned; abatement arising from the petitioner's death set aside; legal heirs permitted to be brought on record, with the amendment to be carried out within one week. ¶¶24

Lilesh S/O Ramesh Daddamwar Vs the Vice-Chairman/Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

05.caw.2222.25.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2222 OF 2025 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.5545 OF 2022

¶6

(Lilesh s/o Ramesh Daddamwar Vs. The Vice-Chairman and Member Secretary, S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur)

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶8

Ms. P.D. Rane, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. A.S. Fulzele, AGP for the State.

¶9

CORAM :- SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.

¶10

DATED :- SEPTEMBER 29, 2025.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

Present application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in bringing legal heirs of the petitioner on record.

¶13

It is contended that the petitioner has expired on 09/12/2024. The separate application is being filed for bringing legal heirs of the petitioner on record; however, there is a delay of 281 days in filing the said application.

¶14

For the reasons stated in the application, sufficient cause is made out for the aforesaid delay of 281 days in filing the application for bringing legal heirs on record.

¶15

Learned AGP has no objection if the said application is allowed.

¶16

¶17

05.caw.2222.25.odt

¶18

Hence, the application is allowed. The delay of 281 days is condoned.

¶19

The application stands disposed of.

¶20

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2221 OF 2025 AND 2220 OF 2025

¶21

Both the applications are filed by the applicant for setting aside abatement in view of the death of the petitioner and for bringing legal heirs of the deceased petitioner on record.

¶22

We have already allowed the Civil Application No.2222/2025 and has condoned the delay in filing the application for bringing legal heirs on record.

¶23

For the reasons stated in the applications, the abatement as against the petitioner because of his death is set aside. So also, the applicant is permitted to bring the legal heirs of the petitioner as mentioned in paragraph No.3 of the application, on record.

¶24

Accordingly, both the applications are allowed and disposed of.

¶25

Learned Counsel for the petitioner to carry out the said amendment within a period of one week from today.

¶26

*Divya

Lilesh S/O Ramesh Daddamwar v. the Vice-Chairman/Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lilesh S/O Ramesh Daddamwar v. the Vice-Chairman/Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rukhmini Ganesh Kale and Another Vs Zilla Parishad, Buldhana, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer and Others

Rukhmini Ganesh Kale and Another Vs Zilla Parishad, Buldhana, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer and Others

Sau. Dhandevi W/O Kuldeep Waghmare vs Kuldeep S/O Rajendra Waghmare

Rajendra S/O Kishor Mahindre Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, Social Justice Dept. Mumbai and Others

Lilesh S/O Ramesh Daddamwar Vs the Vice-Chairman/Member Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Manish S/O Vinod Barekar Vs the Vice-Chairman/Member-Secretary, S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Yavatmal