Allowed¶14

Lata W/O Arun Jaiswal v. State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Rural Development, through Its Secretary, Mumbai

Bombay HC17 Apr 2025CAW/1214/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CAW No.1214/2024 in Writ Petition No.3031/2020; Smt. Lata and others v. State of Maharashtra and others; Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; coram Avinash G. Gharote and Abhay J. Mantri JJ.; dated 17/04/2025; advocates Mayank Sharma for petitioners and T.H. Khan AGP for State; application to amend writ petition to add post-filing facts; AGP no objection; allowed as prayed; amendment within one week; amended copy to respondents within further week; listing after Summer Vacation 2025.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed as prayed; petitioners to carry out the amendment within one week and supply a copy of the amended petition to the respondents within one week thereafter; petition listed after Summer Vacation, 2025. ¶14

Lata W/O Arun Jaiswal Vs State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Rural Development, through Its Secretary, Mumbai — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

caw 1214.24.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1214/2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3031/2020 Smt. Lata and others V State of Maharashtra and others

¶5

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -

¶8

Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate for Petitioners.
Ms. T.H. Khan, AGP for Respondent/State.

¶9

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 17/04/2025

¶10

Heard.

¶11

ii.The petitioners have moved this application to
amend the petition to bring certain facts on record that
occurred after the petition was filed.

¶12

iii.Learned Assistant Government Pleader has not
objected to them.

¶13

iv.Considering the reasons stated in the application
and the learned AGP's no objection, the application is allowed
as prayed.

¶14

v.The petitioners are directed to carry out the
amendment within a period of one week from today and
supply a copy of the amended petition to the respondents
within one week thereafter.

¶15

vi.List the petition after Summer Vacation, 2025.

¶16

 (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶17

Deshmukh

Lata W/O Arun Jaiswal v. State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Rural Development, through Its Secretary, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lata W/O Arun Jaiswal v. State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Rural Development, through Its Secretary, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Shikshan Sanstha, Mangrulpir, Thr. Secretary, Ashok R. Kamble and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Ors.

Yogeshwar Laxman Kapkar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai Thr. Secretary and Others

Kundlik S/O Maniram Thawari Vs Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Wani, Thr. Chairman/ Secretary and Ors.

Tukaram S/O Namdevrao Borkar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Deptt. Mumbai and Others

Yug S/O Jayesh Chudasama vs the District Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member/ Secretary, Amravati

The Blind Relief Association Nagpur Thr. Secy. and Anr. vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Dept. of School Education and Sports (Primary), Mumbai and Ors.