Ex. Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division, Yavatmal v. Madhao Mangu Rathod and Others

Bombay HC25 Jun 2025CAO/470/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench — Civil Application (CAO) 470/2025 and Misc. Civil Application (Stamp) 9273/2025 in Civil Application (CAF) 22044/2023; First Appeal (Stamp) 22043/2023; Executive Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division v. Madhao Mangu Rathod and others; condonation of delay; restoration of first appeal dismissed for non-removal of office objections; deficit court fees; no objection by respondents; Abhay J. Mantri, J.; decided 25-06-2025.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing the application for restoration of the first appeal condoned; first appeal restored to its original file; applications disposed of accordingly. ¶¶10

Ex. Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division, Yavatmal Vs Madhao Mangu Rathod and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 25cao470.25.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) 470 OF 2025 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 9273 OF 2025 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 22044 OF 2023 AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 22043 OF 2023

¶4

( Executive Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division ..vs.. Madhao Mangu Rathod and others )

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

- - - - Ms. Ira Khisti, Advocate for the appellant, Mr. A.A. Zade, Advocate h/f. Mr. S. Varshani, Advocate for respondent No. 1, Ms. M.R. Kavimandan, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

¶7

CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

¶8

DATED : 25-06-2025

¶9

Civil Application No.470/2025 is filed for condonation of delay caused in filing the application for restoration of the first appeal, and Miscellaneous Civil Application (Stamp) No.9273/2025 is for restoration of the first appeal. The learned Advocate for the applicant/appellant submitted that the appeal was dismissed for non-removal of office objections. She submitted that she has received the deficit court fees and undertakes to deposit the same within two weeks. Her statement is accepted. The learned Advocate for respondent No.1 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have given no objection to condoning the delay and restoration of the first appeal.

¶10

Considering the reasons stated in the applications as well as no objection given by the respondents, both applications are allowed. The delay in filing the application for restoration of the first appeal is condoned, and the first appeal is restored to its original file.

¶11

2 25cao470.25.odt

¶12

The applications are disposed of accordingly.

¶13

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)

¶14

adgokar

Ex. Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division, Yavatmal v. Madhao Mangu Rathod and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ex. Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division, Yavatmal v. Madhao Mangu Rathod and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sheela Wd/O Sudhir Bawane and 4 Others Vs Raju S/O Motiram Hemke 2 Others

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Gondia through Branch Manager, Gondia Vs Smt. Varsha Wd/O Naresh Khatwani and Others

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Amravati through T.P. Hub Incharge, Nagpur Vs Smt. Bharti Subodh @ Bandu Bhamodkar and Others

Executive Engineer Nimn Painganga Project Division (Bembala Project), Yavatmal Vs Chandrashekhar Tipanwar and Others

Executive Engineer (v.I.D.C.) Medium Project Division, Nagpur vs Smt. Narmadabai W/O Nagorao Dobale and 2 Others

Ex. Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division, Yavatmal vs Madhao Mangu Rathod and Others