Allowed¶19

Ashok S/O Narayan Sarode and Others v. Smt. Sushila Jethmal Bhutada through P.O.a., Shri Ganesh Mulchand Bhutada and Others

Bombay HC4 Sept 2025CAO/156/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; refusal of registration; Registrar (Judicial); office objections; Civil Revision Application (ST) No.9531 of 2022; Civil Application (CAO) No.156 of 2025; Misc. Civil Application (ST) No.16289 of 2024; Nagpur Bench; Ashok Sarode v. Smt. Sushila Jethmal Bhutada; registration set aside.

What did the court decide?

Both Civil Application (CAO) No.156 of 2025 and Misc. Civil Application (St) No.16289 of 2024 allowed; Registrar (Judicial)'s order dated 14.03.2023 refusing registration set aside; delay in filing the revision application condoned; CRA (ST) No.9531 of 2022 to be registered upon removal of all office objections on or before 19.09.2025, failing which it stands dismissed without further reference to the Court; applications disposed of. ¶19

Ashok S/O Narayan Sarode and Others Vs Smt. Sushila Jethmal Bhutada through P.O.a., Shri Ganesh Mulchand Bhutada and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the order dated 14.03.2023 of the learned Registrar (Judicial) refusing registration of Civil Revision Application (St) No.9531 of 2022 should be set aside and the revision application registered. +1 more

¶15

Court's answer

Civil Application (CAO) No.156 of 2025 and Misc. Civil Application (St) No.16289 of 2024 were allowed and the order dated 14.03.2023 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) refusing registration was set aside.

¶19

Ratio / Principle

Delay caused in filing Civil Revision Application (St) No.9531 of 2022 was condoned.

¶19

Key takeaways

Civil Revision Application (St) No.9531 of 2022 is to be registered, subject to condition that the applicants' advocate removes all office objections on or before 19.09.2025.ratio¶20
In the event the office objections are not removed before 19.09.2025, the civil revision application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.ratio¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench (Rohit W. Joshi, J.), allowed Civil Application (CAO) No.156 of 2025 and Misc. Civil Application (St) No.16289 of 2024 preferred by Ashok S/o. Narayan Sarode and Others against the learned Registrar (Judicial)'s order dated 14.03.2023 refusing registration of Civil Revision Application (St) No.9531 of 2022. The refusal order was set aside and the delay in filing the revision application was condoned. Registration was directed subject to removal of all office objections on or before 19.09.2025, failing which the revision application was to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. The applications were accordingly disposed of.

Ashok S/O Narayan Sarode and Others v. Smt. Sushila Jethmal Bhutada through P.O.a., Shri Ganesh Mulchand Bhutada and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok S/O Narayan Sarode and Others v. Smt. Sushila Jethmal Bhutada through P.O.a., Shri Ganesh Mulchand Bhutada and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manohar S/O Late Shivramji Lakhorkar and Other Vs Anish Maheshkumar Misal

Jaideo S/O Anandrao Thokane Vs Chandrabhaga Wd/O Kisanrao Thokane and Another

Shri Abhishek S/O Shivkumar Sinha and Others vs the Divisional Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies, Nagpur and Others

Shri Gajanan S/O Wasudevrao Satpute vs Vaishali D/O B. Nichat (Earlier Alias- Vaishali W/O Gajanan Satpute)

Sau. Pramila W/O. Santosh Zanwar Vs Satynarayan S/O. Sevaramji Rathi and Others

Chandrakant S/O Vitthalsa Mamarde vs Additional Commissioner, Amravati, Division Amravati and Others