Gulabrao S/O Shankarrao Pachghare v. the State of Maharashtra through Collector, Amravati and Others

Bombay HC23 Dec 2025CAO/1352/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of 1031 days' delay; restoration of appeal dismissed for not filing private paper book; recall of dismissal order; CAO 1352/2025 in Misc. Civil Application ST 27802/2025 in First Appeal No.1940 of 2019 [D]; Gulabrao s/o Shankarrao Pachghare v. The State of Maharashtra and others; Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; Pravin S. Patil, J.; decided 23.12.2025; listing for final disposal after Christmas Vacation; appellant's contention that appeal is covered by First Appeal No.1053/2019; neutral citation 2025:BHC-NAG:14873.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 1031 days condoned; appeal restored to its original position; order dismissing the appeal recalled; office directed to restore the appeal and list it for final disposal after Christmas Vacation. ¶¶16

Gulabrao S/O Shankarrao Pachghare Vs the State of Maharashtra through Collector, Amravati and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:14873

¶2

1 17 CAO 1352.25.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION [CAO] NO.1352 OF 2025 IN

¶5

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.27802 OF 2025

¶6

¶7

FIRST APPEAL NO.1940 OF 2019 [D]

¶8

[Gulabrao s/o Shankarrao Pachghare .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others]

¶9

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions

¶10

and Registrar's orders

¶11

- - - - Shri S.S. Shingane, Advocate for Appellant. Mrs. M. Kavimandan, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶12

CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATED : 23.12.2025.

¶13

By this application, the applicant is seeking the condonation of 1031 days caused in filing the application for restoration of appeal which was dismissed for not filing the private paper book. For the condonation of delay, the applicant has given the specific reasons in para 4 and 5 of the application. 2. Hence, considering the said reasons which are not controverted in the matter, the delay of 1031 days is hereby condoned.

¶14

According to the appellant, the present appeal is covered by the judgment delivered by this court in First Appeal No.1053/2019. Therefore, filing of paper book would not be necessary in the matter. According to him, if this appeal is restored, the same can be decided finally in view of the judgment of this court which covered the subject matter involved in the first appeal.

¶15

2 17 CAO 1352.25.odt

¶16

Hence, for the reasons stated in the application, the appeal is restored to its original position. The order of dismissing the appeal is hereby recalled.

¶17

The office is directed to restore the appeal and list the same for final disposal after Christmas Vacation.

¶18

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.)

¶19

Gulande

Gulabrao S/O Shankarrao Pachghare v. the State of Maharashtra through Collector, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulabrao S/O Shankarrao Pachghare v. the State of Maharashtra through Collector, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bilkis Bano W/O Kalim Manjre vs Kalim S/O Raj Mohammad Manjre

Anup Shyam Karnani vs Shammi Kanhiyalal Mamtani and Others

Neha Virendra Dhawale Vs Virendra D Dhawale and Another

Siddharth S/O Ajay Sisodia and 2 Others vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Pso, Lakadganj, Tq. and Dist. Nagpur and Another

Topworth Urja and Metals Limited, Earlier Shree Virangana Steels Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Mumbai and Others

Akshay S/O Ramesh Dubey and Other vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ambazari Ps Nagpur and Another