Disposed

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai through Its Manager v. Smt. Sharda Wd/O Ramesh Patil and Others

Bombay HC11 Nov 2025CAF/3902/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil application in a pending first appeal seeking permission for respondent no.3, grandson of respondent no.4 (aged 88 and unable to attend), to receive the deposited amount on her behalf under a power of attorney. The court allowed the application and directed the Registry to permit respondent no.3 to receive the amount after completing compliances.

What did the court decide?

Respondent no.3 permitted by Registry to receive amount due to respondent no.4 on her behalf under power of attorney, subject to compliances.

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai through Its… — Motor Accident Claims | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

1 ca3902.25.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CAF No.3902/2025 in First Appeal No.335/2022 (D) Reliance General Insurance Com. Ltd V Smt. Sharda and others

¶4

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

¶7

Mr. D.N. Kukdey, Advocate for appellant.
Mr. S.P. Pawar, Advocate for reps. nos.1 to 4.

¶8

CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 11-11-2025.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

2.This is an application by respondent nos.1 to 4 for directions
to the Registry/Nazir to permit the respondent no.3 -Vrushabh Ramesh
Patil to receive amount on behalf of respondent no.4/Smt. Dwrakabai
Patil. Learned Counsel for respondent no.1 to 4 submits that respondent
no.4 is aged 88 years and on account of her old age and health issues she
is not able to personally remain present for the purpose of receiving the
amount deposited in this Court and for which she is entitled. It is
submitted that respondent no.Vrushabh is her grand son and by virtue of
power of attorney executed in his favour by respondent no.4, respondent
no.3 may be permitted to withdraw the amount.

¶11

3.Learned Advocate Mr. Kukdy for the appellant has no
objection for this application.

¶12

4.Having regard to the contents of the application and
submissions advanced, request appears to be reasonable. Considering the
advanced age of respondent no.4 and considering the fact that the

¶13

2 ca3902.25.odt

¶14

respondent no.3 is her grand son as stated on affidavit and also in the
Power of Attorney, the application needs to be allowed.

¶15

5.Registry is directed to allow respondent no.3 to receive
amount on behalf of respondent no.4 after getting all the compliances
completed from respondent no.3.

¶16

6.Civil application is disposed of

¶17

 (Prafulla S. Khubalkar, J.)

¶18

Deshmukh

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai through Its Manager v. Smt. Sharda Wd/O Ramesh Patil and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai through Its Manager v. Smt. Sharda Wd/O Ramesh Patil and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chatrapalsingh S/O Parasramsingh Chandel vs Surendra (Nanabhau) Sharawan Gawli

Avani Infrastructure, Thr. Managing/Authorized Partner, Vijay F. Bhattad and Ors. vs Ramesh S/O. Kisanlal Taldar and Others

Jayant Keshav Deshpande vs Rekhlal Shamdev Thakre

Latabai Murlidhar Choudhari and Others Vs Prashant Vasantrao Wankhede and Another

Ananta S/O Digambar Diwanji vs Ashish S/O Yashwant Mashankar

Hemant Sureshrao Shirpure vs Honble Minister, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.