Jammu Hussain Daud and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Collector Osmanabad and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Replacement of solvent security and surety; discharge of existing surety (applicant No. 1) and substitution of new sureties Samrin Mohammad Mukebin and Shahin Habib Mukebin; supervening events; withdrawal of amount against double security and equal surety per earlier order dated 18.01.2019; ascertainment by Registrar (Judicial); prayer clause 'B'; Civil Application in First Appeal No. 1116 of 2016; State of Maharashtra through Collector Osmanabad; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; advocates P. B. Rakhunde, D. H. Jadhavar (applicants) and K. K. Naikh, A.G.P. (Respondent No. 1).
What did the court decide?
Permission granted in terms of prayer clause 'B' to replace the solvent security/surety — discharging the security furnished by applicant No. 1 and substituting Samrin Mohammad Mukebin and Shahin Habib Mukebin — with the Registrar (Judicial) to ascertain the fresh security and surety in accordance with the earlier order dated 18.01.2019, subject to his satisfaction.