Balasaheb Bhanudas Bhalekar and Ors. v. Tejrao Narayanrao Fund and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for default / non-prosecution. Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench (Shailesh P. Brahme, J.), 10.09.2025; neutral citation 2025:BHC-AUG:24249. Second Appeals Nos. 278 and 279 of 1999 (Balasaheb Bhanudas Bhalekar and others v. Tejrao Narayanrao Fund and others) dismissed for default after appellants' counsel (Ms. Megha S. Gaur, holding for Mr. S.S. Chadhary) tendered a 'no instruction pursis' (Exh. X) reporting no client response; pending Civil Applications disposed of. Short procedural order only - no merits adjudication, no statutory provisions, no precedents, no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Both second appeals are dismissed for default, the learned counsel for the appellants having tendered a 'no instruction pursis' (marked Exh. X) and reported no response from the appellants despite genuine efforts to contact them.