Allowed

Banubee Sk Kadar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Collector

Bombay HC5 Dec 2025CA/11608/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants challenged the stay conditions due to a dispute over compensation calculation. The court, noting a significant discrepancy in the amount to be deposited, granted the respondent acquiring body an extension of time to deposit the remaining amount within 30 weeks before the court. The conditional stay was allowed to continue.

What did the court decide?

The respondent acquiring body permitted to deposit the remaining amount within 30 weeks; conditional stay to continue.

Banubee Sk Kadar and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

2025:BHC-AUG:35226-DB

¶2

¶3

11608.2025CA.odt

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

¶5

946 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11608 OF 2025 IN FA/2277/2024

¶6

BANUBEE SK KADAR AND ORS VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR

¶8

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.S. Bajaj h/f Mr. Bajaj H.A. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr. Nitin Gangal h/f Mr. Shambhuraje V. Deshmukh, Spl. Counsel

¶9

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND

¶10

VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

¶11

DATED : 5^th DECEMBER, 2025.

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

. This is an application for vacating stay granted vide order dated 12.09.2025 passed in Civil Application No.9142/2024. By the said order, conditional stay was granted to the respondent - acquiring body directing them to deposit the compensation amount to be calculated at the rate of Rs.1,64,230/ per R with cost of litigation, court fees and statutory benefits.

¶14

Pursuant to the said order, the respondents have deposited an amount of Rs.20,20,99,040/-. By the present application, the applicants have pointed out that in fact the compensation amount due and payable to the applicants comes to Rs.62,10,02,387/-. There was dispute in respect of calculations of the compensation amount. We asked S.L.A.O. to calculate the amount as per the award. Accordingly, he has given calculation and according to him, the applicants are entitled for compensation of Rs.58,98,32,098/- plus the court fees and

¶15

¶16

11608.2025CA.odt

¶17

costs of Rs.27,37,269/- is required to be deposited by the respondents in terms of the conditional order. Calculations tendered by learned A.G.P. is taken on record and marked "X" for identification purposes.

¶18

Additional Administrator of CIDCO is present. Learned Advocate for CIDCO submits that since they have to deposit almost an amount of Rs.40 Crores, 30 weeks' time may be granted to deposit the said amount.

¶19

Learned Advocate Mr. Bajaj opposes the said request.

¶20

Considering the fact that huge amount is to be deposited, we permit to the respondent - acquiring body deposit the remaining amount as per calculations within 30 weeks from today. On deposit of the said amount, conditional stay shall continue to operate until further orders.

¶21

With these directions, the application is disposed of.

¶22

(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.)

¶23

sga

Banubee Sk Kadar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banubee Sk Kadar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mirza Ayyub Baig Vs the Deputy Director of Education Aurangabad and Others

Farooqui Moinoddin Kamaloddin Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhumika Ravindra Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pinki Vijay Chug and Anr. Vs Amol Vijayrao Bhagwat and Ors.

M.S Panchshil Infrastructure Ahmednagar vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shripad Dattatraya Baride and Another vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others