Sachin Ashok Mangnale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

2] The applicant is seeking bail as he is arrested on 27.01.2025 in connection with Crime No. 0015 of 2025, registered with Kandhar Police Station, Taluka Kandhar, District Nanded, for the offence punishable under Sections 64 (1) and 69 of the B.N.S. [376 of IPC].

¶14

3] The case against the applicant is that the applicant had maintained physical relation with the informant under the pretext of promise of marriage. As

¶15

2

¶16

785.25BA

¶17

such, the FIR is registered against the applicant. The informant is already married. As such, no such promise made to the informant. Considering the said fact, so also, considering that the applicant is in jail since 27^th January, 2025, investigation in the matter is complete, so also, the charge sheet is filed, the applicant is granted bail. In view of the same, the application is allowed in the following terms :

¶18

a] The applicant shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No. 0015 of 2025, registered with Kandhar Police Station, Taluka Kandhar, District Nanded, for the offence punishable under Sections 64 (1) and 69 of the B.N.S. [376 of IPC], on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

¶19

b] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall not contact the informant, in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the trial.

¶20

c] The applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court and he shall attend each and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court.

¶21

d] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution and he shall not influence

¶22

3

¶23

785.25BA

¶24

the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶25

e] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall place on record of the trial Court the details of his Contact Number and residential address with updates in case of any change.

¶26

4] Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled. It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶27

5] The application stands disposed of.

¶28

6] Ms. Mayur S. Hange, learned counsel appointed by this Court to represent the cause of respondent no.2, shall be paid fees of Rs.10,000/- by the High Court Legal Aid Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad.

¶29

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE

¶30

DDC

Sachin Ashok Mangnale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Ashok Mangnale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Aaves Alias Abbu Shaikh Mahemood Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sushil Shankarrao Chobale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Tapesh Kiran Bhosle Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shaikh Sultan Shaikh Allawali Vs the State of Maharashtra

Salman Khalil Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Aniruddha Mukund Dhas Vs the State of Maharashtra