Mr. Laxman @ Mukka S/O Isaru Brahmankar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Gondia City, Tah. and Dist. Gondia

¶1

(1) 927 ba 394-2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 394 OF 2025

¶4

Mr. Laxman @ Mukka S/o Isaru Brahmankar

¶5

Vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Police Station Gondia City, Tahsil and District Gondia

¶7

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

Mr. P.T. Rokde, Advocate for applicant Ms T.H. Udeshi, APP for respondent/State. Mr. A.S. Pande, Advocate (Appointed) for respondent No.2

¶9

CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 17/06/2025

¶10

The applicant came to be arrested on 09/05/2024 in connection with Crime No.0288/2024 registered with Police Station Gondia City, Gondia, for the offence punishable under Sections 376 (AB), 376 (2)(j) of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 6 of the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act.

¶11

Crime is registered on the basis of report lodged by mother of the victim girl on an allegation that on 08/05/2024, her husband has left the house to attend the work and she also left the house to attend the labour work. At about 6:00 p.m. when she returned home her daughter was found in a weeping condition. On enquiry with her she disclosed that the present applicant has subjected her for the forceful

¶12

(2) 927 ba 394-2025

¶13

sexual assault. On the basis of the said report police have registered the crime against the present applicant.

¶14

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant who submitted that the allegation is not substantiated either by the medical evidence or by the forensic analysis. He further submitted that the applicant himself is deaf and dumb person and suffering from disabilities. The medical certificate is also not substantiates the allegations. Now the investigation is already completed. Charge sheet is already filed. Considering the difficulties the applicant is facing in jail atmosphere, he be released on bail

¶15

Learned APP and learned Counsel for the victim strongly opposed the said application on the ground that considering the statements of the neighbouring witnesses and the statement of the victim the involvement of the present applicant reveals. At this stage, there is nothing on record to show that there is any other reason for the victim to implicate the present applicant in the alleged offence. Considering a very tender aged girl is subjected for the sexual assault, the application deserves to be rejected.

¶16

On hearing both the sides and on perusal of entire investigation papers admittedly no injuries are found on the person of the victim and the forensic report which are placed on record also

¶17

(3) 927 ba 394-2025

¶18

nowhere shows any blood or semen detected on the seized articles. At the same time, there are statements of the independent witnesses who discloses about the circumstance that they have seen present applicant in the company of the victim. Victim has immediately disclosed the said incident to her mother and thereafter immediate report is lodged. At this stage, considering there is nothing on record to show that there is any other reason for the victim to implicate the present applicant.The p rima facie case is made out hence, application deserves to be rejected. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order.

¶19

ORDER

¶20

i) Application is rejected. ii) Fees of the appointed Counsel be quantified as per the Rules.

¶21

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)

¶22

Jayashree ..

Mr. Laxman @ Mukka S/O Isaru Brahmankar v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Gondia City, Tah. and Dist. Gondia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Laxman @ Mukka S/O Isaru Brahmankar v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Gondia City, Tah. and Dist. Gondia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ujjwal S/O Dattu Yeutakar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps, Parshiwani, Dist. Nagpur

Rajendra S/O Pandurang Bahale vs State of Mha. Thr. Anti Corruption Bureau Bhandara Tah. and Dist.Bhandara

Rajesh S/O Vasantrao Chavan vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Malkapur City, Dist. Buldhana and Another

Sitaram Kachru Zingre vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps Risod, Dist. Washim

Vaibhav Ashok Bonde Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps, Rajura, Dist. Chandrapur and Anr.

Chetan S/O Dilip Dongare and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps, Khadan, Tq. and Dist. Akola