Allowed¶18

Mayankar Swamidayal Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC8 Jan 2025BA/2341/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; murder (S.302 IPC) with 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC; Crime No. 135 of 2023, Talegaon Dabhade PS, Pimpri Chinchwad; delayed FIR (lodged 25.3.2023 for 23.03.2023 incident) as ground for bail; P.R. bond Rs.25,000/-; monthly police-station attendance condition; Bombay High Court, single judge (Pramod Lakare).

What did the court decide?

Applicant to be released on bail in Crime No. 135 of 2023 on furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount, and to attend the concerned police station once a month (first Saturday, 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m.) till conclusion of trial. ¶18

Mayankar Swamidayal Yadav vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

10-BA-2341-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2341 OF 2024

¶4

Mayankar Swamidayal Yadav ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶5

Ms. Sana Raees Khan along with Ms Neha Balani, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶6

Ms. P.S. Rane, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶7

API. Pramila P. Kshirsagar Talegaon Dabhade Police Station, Pimpri Chinchwad.

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

This is an application for bail.

¶10

The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No. 135 of 2023 registered at Talegaon Dabhade Police Station Dist- Pimpri Chinchwad , for the offences punishabble under Sections 302, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

According to the prosecution, on the date of incident which took place on 23.3.2023 at about 11.30 pm, the present applicant and the co-accused assaulted the deceased by iron rod and stick and committed his murder, on account of some financial dispute.

1 of 2

Pramod Lakare

10-BA-2341-2024.doc

I have heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent/State.

¶16

Admittedly, the incident took place on 23.03.2023, however, no crime was registered on that day, though according to the prosecution after the alleged incident the deceased was taken to the hospital and there was an eye witness to the incident. It is not understood as to why report was not lodged by the said witness after the alleged incident. The FIR is lodged after two days, i.e., on 25.3.2023. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. In the result, the following order is passed.

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

A] Bail Application is allowed.

¶19

B] The applicant be released on bail in Crime No. 135 of 2023 registered at Talegaon Dabhade Police Station DistPimpri Chinchwad , for the offences punishabble under Sections. 302, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code., on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶20

C] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station once in a month, i.e., on first Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m., till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

2 of 2

¶22

Pramod Lakare

Mayankar Swamidayal Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayankar Swamidayal Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahesh Balasaheb Gawade vs the State of Maharashtra

Amol Kailas Shejwal vs the State of Maharashtra

Sufiyan Faiyaj Chouri vs the State of Maharashtra

Yogesh Pandharinath Ghughe vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Atul Prabhakar Chaugule vs State of Maharashtra

Sawala Shivaji Khade vs State of Maharashtra