Kamblya @ Kamlakar Sathya Bhosale v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Jan 2025BA/2297/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail; murder; circumstantial evidence; last seen together; absence of attributed motive; Sections 302 and 201 r/w 34 IPC; Crime No. 411 of 2022; Vadgaon Nimbalkar Police Station; Pune Rural; incident dated 25.11.2022; Criminal Bail Application No. 2297 of 2024; High Court of Judicature at Bombay; P.R. Bond Rs. 25,000/-; monthly police station attendance till conclusion of trial.

What did the court decide?

Applicant to be released on bail in C.R. No. 411 of 2022 (Vadgaon Nimbalkar Police Station, Pune Rural) on furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount, subject to attending the concerned police station once a month on the first Saturday between 11:00 am and 2:00 pm till conclusion of the trial. ¶¶18

Kamblya @ Kamlakar Sathya Bhosale vs the State… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

19-BA-2297-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2297 OF 2024

¶3

Kamblya @ Kamlakar Sathya Bhosale ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶4

Mr. Tapan Thatte a/w Mr. Vivek Arote a/w Mr. Akshay Dingale a/w Ms. Sangita Ramagond , Advocate for the Applicant.

¶5

Ms. R. D. Humane, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶6

P.C.:

¶7

This is an application for bail.

¶8

The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No. 411 of 2022 registered at Vadgaon Nimbalkar Police Station, Pune Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The present applicant is accused No. 1 in the aforesaid crime. The accused No.2 in the present crime, who is the son-in-law of the present applicant, wanted to marry another daughter of the applicant, who was already married to grand son of the first informant.

¶10

The deceased was the son of the first informant. It is alleged that as the first informant and the deceased were against the said

1 of 2

Pramod Lakare

19-BA-2297-2024.doc

proposal and thus on the date of incident which took place on 25.11.2022, the applicant and accused No. 2 assaulted the deceased and committed his murder.

¶15

I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent/State.

¶16

Admittedly, the case is based on circumstantial evidence. The alleged motive is not attributed to the present applicant. The only incriminating evidence against the present applicant is that the deceased was lastly seen alive in the company of the present applicant and accused No. 2. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. In the result, the following order is passed:

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

A] The Application is allowed.

¶19

B] The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No. 411 of 2022 registered at Vadgaon Nimbalkar Police Station, Pune Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code on furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶20

C] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station once in a month, i.e., on first Saturday between 11:00 am to 2:00 pm, till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

2 of 2

¶22

Pramod Lakare

Kamblya @ Kamlakar Sathya Bhosale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamblya @ Kamlakar Sathya Bhosale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Dattu Kangude vs State of Maharashtra

Adil Nasir Shahpure vs State of Maharashtra

Tukaram Vitthal Deshmukh and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra

Saklesh Sidram Jadhav and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shreeram Pacharam Bishnoi vs the State of Maharashtra

Arjun Vishnu Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra