Vivek Bhatia v. Anju Dhingra
Case brief
What is this about?
Vivek Bhatia v. Anju Dhingra | ARBAP 84 of 2024 | Bombay High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction | Somasekhar Sundaresan J. | Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 | appointment of sole arbitrator | Loan Agreement dated November 28, 2012 | arbitration Clause 12.11 | Nikhil Rajani appointed Sole Arbitrator | disclosure under Sections 11(8) and 12(1) | arbitral costs borne equally | borrower disputes and interlocutory measures left to Arbitral Tribunal | order dated January 29, 2025.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Mr. Nikhil Rajani, Advocate, as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences arising out of and in connection with the Loan Agreement dated November 28, 2012; disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) within two weeks; parties to appear before the arbitrator with contact particulars; email communications to constitute valid service; arbitral costs and fees borne equally in the first instance.