Satish Shrikishan Karwa v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Unreasoned short order of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, dated 9 July 2025, in Criminal Application No. 738 of 2025 filed within Appeal No. 62 of 2025 by applicant Satish Shrikishan Karwa against the State of Maharashtra and respondent No. 2. Counsel: R.A. Karwa for the applicant; S.R. Wakale, A.G.P., for respondent-State; Ms. Meenal Deshmukh holding for Devang Deshmukh for respondent No. 2. Coram: Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Sandipkumar C. More, JJ. Disposition: application allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) for the reasons stated in the application. No statutory provisions or judicial precedents cited; no amounts involved; respondent No. 2 is not identified by name.
What did the court decide?
The criminal application was allowed in terms of prayer clause (B); the substance of the relief sought under prayer clause (B) is not stated in the order.