Abhimanyu Puranlal Mandale Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bail – parity with released co-accused
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular bail granted on parity with released co-accused; offences under Sections 302, 307 (murder/attempt to murder), 384, 386 (extortion), 294, 143, 146-149 IPC (unlawful assembly/rioting), Section 4 r/w 25 Arms Act and Section 135 Maharashtra Police Act; Crime No. 345/2023, Itwara Police Station, Nanded; applicants Kishan Raju Kuril, Anil Fakira Pawar, Vishal Ghanshyam Rautre, Sainath Fakira Pawar, Nitin @ Chota Chingya Sudhakar Jadhav; comparable releases of Shubham Shivajirao Devrai (BA 1704/2024) and Sayyad Imran Sayyad Gause @ Gausoddin (BA 2281/2024); PR bond Rs.20,000 with sureties; condition barring entry into Itwara Police Station jurisdiction and no contact with informant; Dipak Arjun Pawar's bail application dismissed as not pressed; Justice Arun R. Pedneker, Aurangabad Bench, Bombay High Court; BA 2026/2024, BA 2114/2024, BA 2117/2024, BA 2184/2024.
What did the court decide?
Regular bail granted to Kishan Raju Kuril, Anil Fakira Pawar, Vishal Ghanshyam Rautre, Sainath Fakira Pawar and Nitin alias Chota Chingya Sudhakar Jadhav in Crime No. 345/2023 on PR bond of Rs.20,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount, subject to conditions (no entry into Itwara Police Station, Nanded jurisdiction; no contact with informant; attendance on all trial dates unless exempted with reasons recorded in writing; no tampering with prosecution evidence or influencing informant/witnesses; disclosure of contact number and residential address with updates). Application of applicant No. 2 Dipak Arjun Pawar dismissed as not pressed. Applications for assisting the APP allowed. Bail liable to be cancelled on breach of conditions; observations confined to disposal of the bail applications. All applications disposed of.