Baldev Ramesh Aade and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

9 Aasma w/o Arun Rathod, Age 34 yrs., Occ. Household, 10 Arun Baliram Rathod, Age 36 yrs., Occ. Labour, Applicant Nos.9 and 10 are r/o Bhilgaon, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded.

¶18

… Applicants

¶19

… Versus … 1 The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector, Police Station, Mandavi, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded. 2 Sushma w/o Baldev Aade, Age 26 yrs., Occ. Household, R/o Darsangavi, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded. At present C/o Gangadhar Manu Jadhav, R/o Kamthala, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded.

¶20

… Respondents

¶21

Mr. G.G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for applicants

¶22

Mr. V.M. Kagne, APP for respondent No.1

¶23

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 15^th DECEMBER, 2025

¶24

3

¶25

1_Cri.Appln_265_2025_Compromise

¶26

ORDER : ( PER : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. )

¶27

. Present application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashment of the proceedings in Regular Criminal Case No.28/2025 pending before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kinwat, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded, arising out of First Information Report vide Crime No.102/2024 dated 24.11.2024 registered with Police Station, Mandavi, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded, for the offence punishable under Sections 85, 86, 118(2), 382 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

¶28

2 All the accused persons, who have been named in First Information Report and charge sheet, are the applicants before us. It is not in dispute that respondent No.2 got married to applicant No.1 on 03.05.2023.

¶29

3 During the pendency of application, a petition bearing PWDV No.4/2025 was filed by respondent No.2 against applicants before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kinwat. Since the matter was amicably settled, as per order passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kinwat (Court No.2) on 18.09.2025 the said PWDV No.4/2025 has been disposed of as withdrawn.

¶30

4 1_Cri.Appln_265_2025_Compromise

¶31

4 Since the parties have compromised the matter, a pursis by applicant No.1 – husband and respondent No.2 – wife, which is containing the terms and conditions of compromise, has been produced on record. Terms of compromise have been got verified through Notary Public on 15.12.2025. As per the said terms of settlement, respondent No.2 and applicant No.1 have decided to bury the differences and respondent No.2 - informant has given no objection for quashment of the proceedings. Since the dispute that arose was matrimonial dispute and now the parties i.e. applicant No.1 and respondent No.2 are residing together happily, there is no hurdle in allowing the application. Hence, following order.

¶32

ORDER

¶33

i) Criminal Application stands allowed.

¶34

ii) The proceedings in Regular Criminal Case No.28/2025 pending before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kinwat, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded, arising out of First Information Report vide Crime No.102/2024 dated 24.11.2024 registered with Police Station, Mandavi, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded, for the offence punishable under Sections 85, 86, 118(2), 382 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, stands quashed and set aside as against applicants viz. 1) Baldev Ramesh Aade , 2) Ramesh Gulab Aade , 3)

¶35

5 1_Cri.Appln_265_2025_Compromise

¶36

Vimalbai w/o Ramesh Aade , 4) Dhanwan Ramesh Aade , 5) Seema w/o Milind Chavan , 6) Milind Ulhas Chavan , 7) Reshma w/o Jogeshwar Rathod , 8) Jogeshwar Namdev (Premsing) Rathod , 9) Aasma w/o Arun Rathod and

¶37

Arun Baliram Rathod .

¶38

( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. )

¶39

( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. )

¶40

agd

Baldev Ramesh Aade and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baldev Ramesh Aade and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asha Vijay Pawal vs Jm Financial Home Loans Ltd., Thr Its Authorized Signatory and Others

Gorakhnath Rangnath Yadav vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ashfaq Khan Hameed Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Hindustani Education Society Ausa through Its Secretary and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mirza Quiser Baig Mirza Hameed Baig Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary and Others

Shri Sthanakwasi Jain Sangh Trust through Its President and Others Vs Amit Abhay Muttha and Others