Agatrao Achyutrao Watane Vs the State of Maharashtra

grant of bail as a result of conviction recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Latur under sections 304-II, 279, 337, 338 and 427 of Indian Penal Code (IPC).

¶16

Learned counsel for applicant submits that, applicant was

¶17

tried for above offences vide Sessions Case No.100 of 2019. That, by

¶18

Cri.Appln.195.2025 -2-

¶19

judgment and order dated 16.12.2024, he is held guilty and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years. He further submitted that, during trial applicant was on bail. That, fine amount is already paid. Learned counsel further submitted that, applicant is challenged the said judgment and order by filing criminal appeal, it being of 2025 and it would take long time to be heard and decided. According to learned counsel, as there are no immediate prospects of hearing the appeal, he urged for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

¶20

Learned APP opposes the above application on the ground that on full-fledge trial, guilt has been recorded and therefore he prays to reject the application.

¶21

Considering the above submissions, nature of allegations and as there are no immediate prospects of hearing the appeal, which is of 2025 and more particularly, applicant was on bail during trial, relief as prayed deserves to be granted. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order :-

¶22

ORDER

¶23

I. Criminal Application stands allowed.

¶24

Cri.Appln.195.2025 -3-

¶25

II. The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant Agatrao s/o Achyutrao Watane in Sessions Case No. 100 of 2019 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Latur on 16.12.2024 stands suspended till the final hearing and disposal of Criminal Appeal No.35 of 2025.

¶26

III. The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount.

¶27

IV. The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.

¶28

V. The applicant shall remain present before the learned trial Judge once in six months, till final hearing and disposal of the appeal, commencing from the date he tenders bail papers and thereafter, the trial Judge to fix dates for his subsequent appearances.

¶29

VI. In case of two consecutive defaults on the part of the applicant to remain present before the trial court, the trial court to inform this court about the same and in that eventuality, the prosecution would be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail granted to the applicant.

¶30

VII. Bail before the trial court.

¶31

[ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.]

¶32

Tandale

Agatrao Achyutrao Watane v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Agatrao Achyutrao Watane v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwan Gahenaji Sakhale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shyam @ Pratap Narayan Zinzan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sunil Vishwanath Bele Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhaiyasaheb Dongar Nikam Vs Kumar Kalpesh Bhaiyasaheb Nikam through Arun Shenpadu Pawar

Dnyanehwar Balasaheb Khodve Vs Anand Devidas Chopde and Others

Sayan Asit Panda Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others