Pravin @ Ganesh Pralhad Khillare Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Ps Buldhana City Tha Dist Buldhana

¶1

1

¶2

42.appa.758.24.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.758 OF 2024 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.430 OF 2024

¶6

(Pravin @ Ganesh Pralhad Khillare Vs. State of Maharashtra)

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶8

Mr. M.P. Kariya, Advocate for the appellant. Mrs. S.V. Kolhe, APP for the State.

¶9

CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- JANUARY 2, 2025

¶10

Heard.

¶11

By this application, the appellant is seeking suspension of sentence and releasing him on bail.

¶12

Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant was prosecuted of the offence punishable under Sections 452, 354-A, 354-D and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8, 11(1)(iv) and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, the victim who is resident of Jambhrun, Tahsil and District Buldhana residing along with his mother and two sisters. She was studying in 9^th standard at the relevant time. The appellant was residing adjoining to her house. On the day of incident i.e. on 13/03/2019 during night hours when she was sleeping in the house along with other family members, the appellant entered in her house and

¶14

2

¶15

42.appa.758.24.odt

¶16

physically contacted her and outraged her modesty. On the basis of the said report, police have registered the crime against the present appellant. During the trial, the evidence was adduced before the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana. The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana held the accused guilty for the offence punishable under Section 452 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs.2000/- in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for three months. The appellant is also convicted of the offence punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for three months.

¶17

Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the punishment imposed is of a limited period. From the impugned judgment he pointed out that he has many arguable points in the present appeal. The appeal would take its own time for its final disposal. In the meantime, if sentence is executed the purpose of preferring the appeal would frustrate. In fact, the sentenced imposed by holding the appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act itself is erroneous. In view of that, he be released on bail and the execution of sentenced be suspended.

¶18

Learned APP strongly opposed the application on the ground that a minor girl was subjected for the

¶19

3

¶20

42.appa.758.24.odt

¶21

sexual harassment by the appellant who is a married person and if he is released on bail by suspending the sentence there is every likelihood of pressurizing the victim. In view of that, the application deserves to be rejected.

¶22

I have heard learned Counsel for both the parties and perused the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana from which learned Counsel for the appellant has pointed out that he has many arguable points in the present appeal. The appeal would take its own time for its final disposal. In the meantime, if sentence is executed the purpose of preferring the appeal would frustrate. In view of that, the application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, I proceed to pass following order :

¶23

(i) The application is allowed.

¶24

(ii) The execution of the sentence vide order dated 07/06/2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana in Special Case No.18/2019 is hereby suspended till final disposal of the appeal.

¶25

(iii) The appellant – Pravin @ Ganesh Pralhad Khillare be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Rs. Twenty Five thousand) with one surety, in the like amount.

¶26

4

¶27

42.appa.758.24.odt

¶28

(iv) The appellant shall attend the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana once in a month i.e. 5^th day of every month and Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana shall record his presence before it.

¶29

The application stands disposed of.

¶30

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.430 OF 2024

¶31

The R. & P. is already received.

¶32

Place the appeal before the Court after preparation of the paper book.

¶33

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)

¶34

*Divya

Pravin @ Ganesh Pralhad Khillare v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Ps Buldhana City Tha Dist Buldhana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravin @ Ganesh Pralhad Khillare v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Ps Buldhana City Tha Dist Buldhana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Daulatabai Shahabuddin Sattani and Anr. Vs Smt.Kulshambai Wd/O Allibhai Ajani

Sau. Meenakshi Chandrakant Malode Vs State of Mah. Thr. Ps Incharge Gadge Nagar Amravati (City) Tq. and Dist.Amravati

Nikhil Banduji Raut Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Girad, Dist. Wardha

Vijay Mangal Meshram vs the State of Maharashtra Pso Ps Sitabuldi Nagpur Dist Nagpur

M/ Au Small Fin. Bank (M/S Au. Fin. (India) Ltd.) Thr. Mr. Vijay S/O Ramdas Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Officer in Charge Ps Washim City Dist.Washim and Another

Smt Himanshi Deepak Aswani Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Sadar and Another