An appeal against an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act was disposed of dismiss abatement due to death of one respondent. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-apeal-1308-2006.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1308 OF 2006
Anant Agencies
…Appellant
V/s.
Atul Cycles and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. P. Deshpande a/w Mr. Vilas Tapkir i/b Mr. Vilas Tapkir, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Anil Wani, a/w Adv. Snehal Adhangale, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 17.10.2025.
P.C. :
against respondent No.1/accused for the offence punishable under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial Court by the judgment and order dated 27.09.2006 in Summary Trial Case No. 425 of 2004 has acquitted the respondent No.1. The appellant has thus filed this appeal.
that during the pendency of the present appeal the respondent
Pramod S.Lakare
1/2
9-apeal-1308-2006.doc
No.1 has expired on 20.04.2025. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 has tendered the death certificate to that effect on record. The death certificate is marked as “X” for the purpose of identification.
abated.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
Pramod S.Lakare
2/2
Anant Agencies
Pramod S. Lakare
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
