Dismissed¶19

Krushna Lahanu Goykar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC21 Aug 2025ABA/761/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Krushna Lahanu Goykar v. State of Maharashtra, Anticipatory Bail Application No. 761 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Coram: Abhay S. Waghwase, J.; reserved 19 August 2025, pronounced 21 August 2025. Application under s.482 BNSS 2023 for pre-arrest bail in Crime No.204/2024, Nijampur P.S., Dhule, offence u/s 310(2) BNS; FIR dated 01.08.2024 by Tata Solar Power security guard; theft of copper cable wire valued Rs.13,00,000/-; accused armed with deadly weapons; recovery pending; anticipatory bail rejected.

What did the court decide?

Considering the allegations — theft of copper wire/cable by 10 to 12 persons found armed with deadly weapons, with recovery of the wire yet to be effected — the court was not inclined to grant the pre-arrest bail prayed for. ¶18

Krushna Lahanu Goykar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

-1ABA-761-2025

¶2

2025:BHC-AUG:22777

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 761 OF 2025

¶5

Shri Krushna Lahanu Goykar … Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and Another … Respondents.

¶8

Mr. A. V. Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S. M. Ganachari, APP for Respondents.

¶9

CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

¶10

RESERVED ON : 19 AUGUST 2025

¶11

PRONOUNCED ON : 21 AUGUST 2025

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

This is an application under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 preferred by the applicant for pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.204 of 2024 registered with Nijampur police station, Dist. Dhule for the offences punishable under section 310(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶14

Learned counsel for applicant submitted that, there are allegations of theft of copper wire of solar system. That, no specific role is attributed. That, there are allegation of mere holding sword and it is not put to use. That, general allegations are levelled against 10 persons without specifying role. That, applicant is ready to co-operate with the

¶15

-2ABA-761-2025

¶16

investigation. Nothing is to be recovered from him and hence, protection by way of anticipatory bail is urged for.

¶17

Learned APP opposed by pointing out that there is theft of copper wire worth Rs.13,00,000/-. Accused persons committed above act coming armed with deadly weapon like sword. According to learned APP, recovery of wire is yet to be effected.

¶18

Perused the FIR dated 01.08.2024. Security guard of Tata Solar Power reported police that, he knows accused persons of Navagaon and he reported that, on the intervening night of 31.07.2024 and 01.08.2024, he spotted 10 to 12 persons committing theft of copper cable wire and when he rushed to catch them, it is alleged that, accused persons were found to be armed with axe, koyta, wire cutter, iron rod and those persons pelted stone and caught informant and his colleagues and thereafter fled. Therefore, he lodged report against in all 10 persons including present applicant. Statement is made across the bar by learned APP that recovery is yet to be effected. Considering the above allegations, this court is not inclined to grant relief as prayed.

¶19

The anticipatory bail application is rejected.

¶20

(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.)

¶21

Tandale

Krushna Lahanu Goykar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krushna Lahanu Goykar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gajanan Rambhau Ubale Vs Meena W/O Gajanan Ubale and Other

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Thr Its Manager Vs Vijaymala Munjaji Karhale and Ors.

Sujata Nishant Manwar Vs Nishant Ramesh Manwar

Samadhan Baburao Khindkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Madhav Shamrao Mane Died Thr Lrs Prayagbai and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Collector Osmanabad and Ors.

Dnyaneshwar Shriram Lohar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another