Dismissed¶23

Ramesh Laxman Dongardive v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC22 Sept 2025ABA/424/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail dismissed for misuse of interim protection; applicant failed to attend Police Station on 07.04.2025 and 08.04.2025 despite direction; interim order dated 17.03.2025 with conditions incl. PR bond Rs.15,000/-; Crime No.37/2025, CIDCO Police Station, Taluka & District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar; Sections 376, 376(2)(N), 506 IPC; Ramesh Laxman Dongardive v. The State of Maharashtra; ABA No.424/2025; connected Crl. Application No.2788/2025 (assist to P.P.) disposed; Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad; NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.; decided 22.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

The Applicant misused the interim protection granted by this Court by not attending the Police Station as directed; accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. ¶23

Ramesh Laxman Dongardive Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:BHC-AUG:25800

¶2

18-ABA-424-2025.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

18 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 424 OF 2025 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2788 OF 2025

¶5

Ramesh Laxman Dongardive VERSUS

¶6

The State of Maharashtra

¶7

Mr. A. R. Lukhe h/f Mr. Kirankumar R. Khandalkar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N. D. Batule, APP for the Respondent – State

¶8

Mr. Ganesh Arjun Ambildhage [Absent], Advocate for Victim [assist to APP]

¶9

CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 22.09.2025

¶10

PER COURT :

¶11

Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that, after the

¶12

Applicant was protected by this Court vide order dated 17^th March, 2025 on certain conditions, the Applicant is not in his contact. He submits that, appropriate orders be passed.

¶13

Learned APP appearing for the Respondent – State submits that,

¶14

by the order dated 17^th March, 2025, the Applicant was protected by interim order on certain conditions, which reads as under :

¶15

“A] Till the next date, in the event the applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No.37/2025, registered with CIDCO Police Station, Taluka & District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376(2)(N), 506 of

¶16

¶17

18-ABA-424-2025.odt

¶18

IPC, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶19

B] The applicant shall remain present before the investigating officer as and when required by the investigating officer.

¶20

C] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation, including producing all documents in his possession, as may be demanded by the investigating officer.

¶21

D] The applicant shall not influence the informant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case and he shall not tamper with the evidence.”

¶22

Learned APP tenders a copy of the report submitted by the Investigating Officer dated 17^th April, 2025 that, the Applicant was asked to attend the Police Station on 7^th and 8^th April, 2025 between 10:30 a.m. to 01:30 p.m., however, the Applicant did not attend and entry in that regard is made in the station diary.

¶23

From the above submission, it is clear that, the Applicant misused the protection granted to him. Hence, Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed.

¶24

In view of dismissal of the Anticipatory Bail Application, Criminal Application for assist to P.P. does not survive and the same stands disposed off accordingly.

¶25

[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]

¶26

Signed by: Md. Sameer Q. Sameer/September-2025 Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 22/09/2025 19:38:37

¶27

Ramesh Laxman Dongardive v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Laxman Dongardive v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taher Abdul Raheman Mewati and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Asir Alias Asif Liyakat Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nandalal Hilal Patil and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Swami Dhyan Chatyana Maharaj (Secty.)Shri Swami Atmachaitanya Vishveshwar Trust, Wardha and 2 Other vs Shri Kiran Balwantrao Deshmukh and Others

Bhagwan S/O Narayan Kendre vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Aasegaon Dist Washim and Anr.

Maheshwar Shankarrao Sarode vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Ps Walgaon