Dismissed¶12
Sacheen Kashinath Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCABA/315/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Sacheen Kashinath Patil v. State of Maharashtra, ABA No. 315 of 2023, Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), decided 2 January 2025 by Arun R. Pedneker, J. Applicant represented by Mr. R. N. Bharaswadkar; State represented by APP Mr. R. S. Wani. Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous after the applicant's arrest during the pendency of the application; no statutory provisions or precedents cited; no discussion of bail merits.
What did the court decide?
Since the applicant was arrested during the pendency of the anticipatory bail application, the matter stands rendered infructuous and the application is dismissed as infructuous. ¶12