Disposed¶8

Yadvendra Dilip Sharma v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Anticipatory Bail – Interim protection granted

Bombay HC4 Dec 2025ABA/2145/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application, interim pre-arrest protection; Yadvendra Dilip Sharma v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; Mehroz K. Pathan, J; decided 04.12.2025; Crime No. 375/2025, Washi Police Station, District Dharashiv; Sections 140(3), 351(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; P.R. bond Rs. 50,000 with solvent sureties; reporting conditions every Tuesday and Wednesday 11:00 a.m.-01:00 p.m.; online complaint to SP Osmanabad dated 11.11.2025; notice returnable 18.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail protection: in the event of arrest, release on P.R. bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount, subject to conditions; notice issued to Respondents, returnable on 18.12.2025. ¶8

Yadvendra Dilip Sharma vs the State of Maharashtra and Another — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Whether the Applicant, Yadvendra Dilip Sharma, is entitled to anticipatory bail / protection in the event of arrest in Crime No. 375/2025 (Washi Police Station, District Dharashiv) for offences under Sections 140(3) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶14

Court's answer

Considering that the Applicant had filed an online complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Osmanabad on the very date of the FIR (11.11.2025), the Court was inclined to protect the Applicant till the investigation papers are received.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

In the event of arrest, the Applicant is to be released on bail on furnishing a P.R. bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount, in connection with Crime No. 375/2025, Washi Police Station, District Dharashiv.

¶14

Key takeaways

Release is subject to conditions: the Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer every Tuesday and Wednesday between 11:00 a.m. and 01:00 p.m., cooperate with the investigation, shall not tamper with evidence, and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.ratio¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory Bail – Interim protection granted – Offences alleged under Sections 140(3) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Crime No. 375/2025, Washi Police Station, District Dharashiv – Applicant had filed an online complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Osmanabad on the very date of the FIR (11.11.2025), annexed to the application – Held: Applicant to be protected till investigation papers are received; in the event of arrest, release on P.R. bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount – Conditions: report to Investigating Officer every Tuesday and Wednesday between 11:00 a.m. and 01:00 p.m., cooperate with investigation, not tamper with evidence – Notice to Respondents returnable on 18.12.2025; learned APP waives service for the State.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

907 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2145 OF 2025

¶3

YADVENDRA DILIP SHARMA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶4

Mr. V. D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. V. K. Bhosale a/w Mr. Y. A. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. P. D. Patil, APP for the Respondent/State

¶5

CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J DATE : 04.12.2025

¶6

P. C. :-

¶7

Heard.

¶8

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 18.12.2025. Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent/State.

¶9

Taking into consideration the fact that the Applicant also had filed a complaint on the very same date of FIR i.e. on 11.11.2025 to the Superintendent of Police, Osmanabad vide an online complaint, which is annexed to the present application, I am inclined to protect the Applicant till the investigation papers are

¶10

1 of 2

¶11

907.aba2145.25.odt

¶12

received. Hence the following order:-

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(I) In the event of arrest of the Applicant – Yadvendra Dilip Sharma, he be released on bail on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount, in connection with Crime No.375/2025 registered with Washi Police Station, District Dharashiv, for the offences punishable under Sections 140(3), 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on the following conditions:

¶15

(a) The Applicant is directed to attend the concerned police station and report to the Investigating Officer in a week on every Tuesday and Wednesday between 11:00 a.m. to 01:00 p.m. and co-operate with the Investigating Officer.

¶16

(b) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, apart from the day already mentioned above.

¶17

¶18

(d) The learned APP is directed to take instructions as regards the material collected against the Applicant/accused.

¶19

(MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J)

¶20

ssp

¶21

2 of 2

¶22

907.aba2145.25.odt

Yadvendra Dilip Sharma v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yadvendra Dilip Sharma v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Umedsing Govindsing Padvi (Alleged as Umed) and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sangita Bhaskar Joshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shubham Balasaheb Bangar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dattatrya Bapurao Solanke vs Swati Ganpatrao

Dattatrya Bapurao Solanke vs Swati Ganpatrao

Aruna Mohan Misal (Chandne) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another